Re: "Field weights"

2007-12-16 Thread Karl Wettin
Thanks for the replies. I miserably failed to explain my problem. I focused too much on the content similarity between the fields and completely missed out on things such as that car brands and tire brands are not propotionally large compared to the data in my domain. I have tens of thousan

Re: Query.rewrite - help me to understand it

2007-12-16 Thread Daniel Noll
On Thursday 13 December 2007 23:07:49 游泳池的鱼 wrote: > hehe ,you can do a test with PrefixQuery rewrite method,and extract terms . > like this > query = prefixQuery.rewrite(reader); > query.extractTerms(set); > for(String term : set){ > System.out.println(term); > } > > It will give you

Re: Heads-up on SSD

2007-12-16 Thread Toke Eskildsen
Chris Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Toke, This is fantastic stuff! I always wanted to convince (rich) > customers to try SSD. Now it's more convincing! We expect to _save_ money by using SSDs. They cost more that conventional harddrives if you just look at them isolated, but when we look at per

Re: Boosting hits based on a value in a field, without that field contributing to the search

2007-12-16 Thread chee wu
Hi Tom, I have the similar requirement, and have found a way .. TermQury is an atom query,other queries like boolean query will be spitted into term queries rang query etc.You can customize your own TermScorer, add a new "IndexReader" object in TermScorer, and retrieve the field value of the