Hello, I tried finding information about this from past mailing list
emails, but couldn't find anything. I'm using Lucene 1.4 series and
wondered if it is safe for two different JVMs opening and searching the
same physical index located on the local file system, with one of the JVMs
performing writ
My guess is you want to look into the Scorer implementations. I am
not sure Lucene's term vector storage is needed, you could just store
the terms as they always are and implement your own Query/Weigh/Scorer
combo that ignores TF and uses your new approach.
See http://lucene.apache.org/jav
On 6-Nov-07, at 3:02 PM, Paul Elschot wrote:
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 23:14:01 Mike Klaas wrote:
Wait--shouldn't the outer-most BooleanQuery provide most of this
speedup already (since it should be skipTo'ing between the nested
BooleanQueries and the outermost). Is it the indirection and
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 23:14:01 Mike Klaas wrote:
> On 29-Oct-07, at 9:43 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
> > On Friday 26 October 2007 09:36:58 Ard Schrijvers wrote:
> >> +prop1:a +prop2:b +prop3:c +prop4:d +prop5:e
> >>
> >> is much faster than
> >>
> >> (+(+(+(+prop1:a +prop2:b) +prop3:c) +prop4:d)
On 29-Oct-07, at 9:43 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
On Friday 26 October 2007 09:36:58 Ard Schrijvers wrote:
+prop1:a +prop2:b +prop3:c +prop4:d +prop5:e
is much faster than
(+(+(+(+prop1:a +prop2:b) +prop3:c) +prop4:d) +prop5:e)
where the second one is a result from BooleanQuery in
BooleanQuery
You would have to take the original input and re-analyze it and put it
into the TermFreqVector format. It's just a list of terms and their
frequencies for a given doc, so it should be pretty straightforward to
do. Just extra runtime computation.
-Grant
On Nov 6, 2007, at 1:06 AM, Shailen
6 nov 2007 kl. 09.51 skrev Shailendra Mudgal:
Hi,
If while indexing we have not set this flag, then is there any
other way to
get this info, i mean the TermFreqVector for a document ??
See TermVectorAccessor in JIRA.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1016
The highligher also has
Hi,
If while indexing we have not set this flag, then is there any other way to
get this info, i mean the TermFreqVector for a document ??
On 8/3/07, testn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> you can use IndexReader.getTermFreqVectors(int n) to get all terms and
> their
> frequencies. Make sure whe
Cool.
I'll do since this is a field which I can spend time in.
Kindly
//Marcus
On 11/5/07, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 5, 2007, at 7:49 AM, Marcus Herou wrote:
>
> > Thanks. They seem to have got real far in the dev cycle on this.
> > Seems like
> > it will hit the ro
