Alexander,
I'd stay away from NFS (slow). It sounds like you'd benefit from moving from
vanilla Lucene to Solr that your app(s) could query from different boxes.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Alexander Wallace <[EMAIL PROTEC
Uwe,
I don't have the answer to your main question, but will point you to the ngram
set of tokenizers in Lucene's contrib/, in case you want to use that instead of
maintaining your own bi-gram tokenizer.
Otis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.
Maybe I'm missing something, but that looks like the correct
order to me, they are both on September 02, 2007, 11:30 P.M, and
]24 seconds is before 48 seconds.
Or is it just late and I'm missing the obvious (a specialty of mine)...
Erick
On 10/18/07, Dragon Fly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Hi,
I'm am trying to sort a date field in my index but I'm seeing strange results.
I have searched the Lucene user mail archive for Datetools but still couldn't
figure out the problem.
The date field is indexed as follows (i.e. DateTools is used, date field is
stored and untokenized):
Strin
Hi Guys,
Do anyone who tests the Analyzers can give me some CJK test resources or
advice me from where to obtain.
Best Regards,
Ivan
Ivan Vasilev wrote:
Hi Guys,
We just implemented multi language support in our application. We
tested it with some files which content is copy/pasted from s
We use lucene in our product since version 1.2.
I have developed a new Bigramm stemmer and would like to get a
suggestion how to implement the needed scorer for it.
Using a Boolean query with a slope I get most of the time the correct
documents.
For example: The Bigramm split for "docume
Hi Grant,
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I think the answer is:
> [{ "MAddDocs" AddDoc } : 5000] : 4
>
> Is this the functional equivalent of doing:
> { "MAddDocs" AddDoc } : 2
>
> in parallel?
Yes, this is correct, it reads as "create 4 threads, each
adding 5000 docs to the index, and start/run t
