: As usual, thank you to the gruff but brilliant Mr Hostetter.
Doh! ... sorry if i've been gruffer then usual ... i've been rotating my
sleep schedule so my days start an hour earlier each day for the last 6
days. it's been throwing my psyche for a loop.
-Hoss
--
As usual, thank you to the gruff but brilliant Mr Hostetter.
- Mark
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I have only taken passing glances at Solr, so I am afraid I cannot be of much
: help. Certainly one of the Solr guys will be able to be of assistance though.
the StandardRequestHandler in solr will acc
: I have only taken passing glances at Solr, so I am afraid I cannot be of much
: help. Certainly one of the Solr guys will be able to be of assistance though.
the StandardRequestHandler in solr will accept anythign the lucene
QueryParser will accept ... sublcassing StandardRequestHandler to us
: Around Sept. 20 I started getting Japanese spam to this account. This is
: a special account I only use for the Solr and Lucene user mailing
: lists. Did anybody else get these, starting around 9/20?
Note that many mailing list archives leave the sender emails in plain text
(which results in
Hi-
Around Sept. 20 I started getting Japanese spam to this account. This is
a special account I only use for the Solr and Lucene user mailing
lists. Did anybody else get these, starting around 9/20?
Lance Norskog
On 10/10/07, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have a look at the contrib/memory package delivered with Lucene. It
> contains a MemoryIndex which is designed exactly for this scenario.
That's a fast way to see if a single doc matches a query, but it won't
give you the same score as if
Have a look at the contrib/memory package delivered with Lucene. It
contains a MemoryIndex which is designed exactly for this scenario.
On Oct 10, 2007, at 12:44 PM, lucene_user wrote:
I would like to score a single document from a corpus based on a
given query.
The formula score(q,d) is
What is the appropriate way of achieving both stopwords and stemming of
stopwords when the MoreLikeThis class is used? My analyzer
(MoreLikeThis.setAnalyzer) uses the Snowball filter, and is initialized
with a stopwords set:
analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(stopwords) {
public Token
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 18:44, lucene_user wrote:
> I would like to score a single document from a corpus based on a given
> query. The formula score(q,d) is basically what I am looking for.
>
> Pseudo Code of Something Close to what I am looking for:
> indexReader.score(query, documentId);
>
I have only taken passing glances at Solr, so I am afraid I cannot be of
much help. Certainly one of the Solr guys will be able to be of
assistance though.
Since Qsol generates Query objects, you just need to find out how to
bypass sending solr a query String and instead give it a Query object
I would like to score a single document from a corpus based on a given query.
The formula score(q,d) is basically what I am looking for.
Pseudo Code of Something Close to what I am looking for:
indexReader.score(query, documentId);
The formula score(q,d) is used throughout the documentation to
On Oct 10, 2007, at 9:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, image field is binary. However, image size is not more than
1KB. We would use a combination of text search to narrow down the
results. But once we get the results, we would want to search all
images (within the above resultset) wit
Mark,
On Wed, October 10, 2007, Martin Dietze wrote:
> > Qsol: myhardshadow.com/qsol (A query parser I wrote that has fully
> > customizable precedence support - don't be fooled by the stale website...I
> > am actually working on version 2 as i have time)
>
> That sounds promising, I will chec
Yes, image field is binary. However, image size is not more than 1KB. We would
use a combination of text search to narrow down the results. But once we get
the results, we would want to search all images (within the above resultset)
with the user given image file.
Ideally, your 2nd approac
The best place is the Lucene website, including the wiki and the
javadocs. Is there something in particular you are interested in?
-Grant
On Oct 10, 2007, at 4:05 AM, Raghu Ram wrote:
Is there any document or book that discusses lucene internal
details
On 10/10/07, Peter W. <[EMAIL
Mark,
this reply was just in time :)
On Wed, October 10, 2007, Mark Miller wrote:
> Precedence QueryParser (I think its in Lucene contrib packages - I don't
> believe its perfect but I have not tried it)
I checked that one out, and while it improves things with
default settings I found it to
On Tue, October 09, 2007, Daniel Naber wrote:
> The operator precedence is known to be buggy. You need to use parenthesis,
> e.g. (aa AND bb) OR (cc AND dd)
This would be fine with me but unfortunately not for my users.
More precisely, I need to analyze a query string from one search
engine, fil
Yes, you should close the indices before adding them. Both of the addIndexes*
methods that take Directory[] require that there are no writers changing the
index in those directories.
They do not acquire the write lock in those Directories, so it's up to your
application to ensure no writer chang
There is a lot on this topic if you search the archives.
Things to check out:
Precedence QueryParser (I think its in Lucene contrib packages - I don't
believe its perfect but I have not tried it)
Qsol: myhardshadow.com/qsol (A query parser I wrote that has fully
customizable precedence suppo
Hi
The IndexMergeTool (see url below) creates a new index, the "mergedIndex".
Do the other indexes, "index1", "index2", etc, need to be closed
before performing the merge?
This is the same as asking if the indexes passed to
IndexWriter.addIndexes need to be closed before they are added to the
new
> I have a question that I can't quite seem to find the answer to by
> googling or searching the archives of this mailing list. The problem
> is I would like to weight some fields more than others. Assume that I
> have three fields: title, author, and default where title and author
> contain there
Hi Scott,
Would indexing time field boosts work for you?
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/scoring.html#Score%20Boosting
Doron
"Scott Phillips" wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a question that I can't quite seem to find the answer to by
> googling or searching the archives of this mailing list
Is there any document or book that discusses lucene internal details
On 10/10/07, Peter W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Cool!
>
> The quality of first LIA really shined even for
> those familiar with Java but new to assertions
> and unit tests. Can't wait to buy LIA2...
>
> Please accept th
23 matches
Mail list logo
