Hi,
We have an application in which we want to index feeds. Each feed is a
collection of articles and some other metadata. The problem is that
sometimes we want to search for feeds and sometimes for articles. As far as
I know lucene doesn't provide any abstraction for grouping its documents.
5 okt 2007 kl. 21.50 skrev vivek sar:
Once the writer.addIndexes is done I call writer.optimize()
No biggie, but IndexWriter.addIndexes() will automatically optimize,
so that is one line of code you can get rid of.
it may take hours to re-index
/Perhaps/ using IndexWriter.addIndexesNoO
: Once in a while we kill the running application using "kill -9". I
To quote a great man, who frequently quotes another great man: "Well
there's your problem!"
stop using "kill -9" ... i'll say it again because it's important, and
i'm even going to violate etiquite and use all caps because it
: Is there any way to find out if an instance of Query has any terms within it?
: I have a custom parser (QueryParser does not do everything I need) and it
: somtimes creates empty BooleanQuerys. (This happens as a side effect of
so you're problem is not "does a Query have any terms in it" it's "
>
> Hmmm.. can you give some more concrete examples of what you mean by this?
> both in terms of the use case you are trying to satisfy, and in terms of
> how your current code works ... you don't have to post code or give away
> trade secrets, just describe it as a black box (ie: what is the input
Thanks for the response Michael.
Sorry, I'm using Lucene 2.2. We are using Lucene to index our database
(Oracle) into documents for full-text search feature. Here is the
process of indexing,
1) Have two IndexWriters which run in two different threads and write
to two different directories (tempor
On 5-Oct-07, at 11:27 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
that's what i thought first too, and it is a problem i'd eventaully
like
to tackle ... it was the part about "c" being in a differnet field
from
"a" and "b" that confused me ... i don't know what that exactly is
being
suggested here.
I'm
: > : would like to allow for the possibility that a and b are near each other
: > in
: > : one field, while c is in another field.
: I understand the OP to want a PhraseQuery that has an intention (rather than
: side-effect) of doing proximity-based scoring.
:
: "phrase query here"~1000 is the
On 5-Oct-07, at 10:54 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I am using a hand rolled query of the following form (implemented
with
: SpanNearQuery, not a sloppy PhraseQuery):
: a b c => +(a AND b AND c) OR "a b"~5 OR "b c"~5
:
: The obvious solution, "a b c"~5, is not applicable for my issues,
becaus
hi,
ihave just downloaded lucene 2.2.0 and tomcat, and have set my classpaths ,
now i am got stuck at the very first stage of indexing files, which ask me
to do like this
java org.apache.lucene.demo.IndexFiles {full-path-to-lucene}/src
i dont know from which directory i have to execute this comma
: I am using a hand rolled query of the following form (implemented with
: SpanNearQuery, not a sloppy PhraseQuery):
: a b c => +(a AND b AND c) OR "a b"~5 OR "b c"~5
:
: The obvious solution, "a b c"~5, is not applicable for my issues, because I
: would like to allow for the possibility that a an
What makes you think the query needs to be rewritten to extract terms?
Not the case...unless you want to extract Terms from say, a Wildcard or
Fuzzy query. In that case you need an IndexReader however, as the terms
in the Wildcard/Fuzzy query are determined by what is in your index...
I am als
Hi,
Is there any way to find out if an instance of Query has any terms
within it? I have a custom parser (QueryParser does not do everything I
need) and it somtimes creates empty BooleanQuerys. (This happens as a
side effect of recursive parsing - even if there are no terms for a
query, I sti
You may want to look at the FunctionQuery capability, either in
Lucene, or the expanded capabilities (recently added) in Solr.
-Grant
On Oct 4, 2007, at 2:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Were planning to use Lucene or Solr within our
application and wanted to know if it can support the
"vivek sar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are using Lucene 2.3.
Do you mean Lucene 2.2? Your stack trace seems to line up with 2.2,
and 2.3 isn't quite released yet.
> The problem we are facing is quite a few times if our application is
> stopped (killed or crash) while Indexer is doing its j
15 matches
Mail list logo
