Peter W. marketingbrokers.com> writes:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is not currently in Lucene.
>
> Sounds like you are looking for a voting
> system to generate float scores that would be
> inserted as a sortable field at index time.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter W.
Hi Peter,
But the voting is query depe
Hello,
This is not currently in Lucene.
Sounds like you are looking for a voting
system to generate float scores that would be
inserted as a sortable field at index time.
Gathering user feedback on search results is
hard because you need to introduce a layer
which logs the click then redirects
16 mar 2007 kl. 02.13 skrev xiong:
karl wettin gmail.com> writes:
15 mar 2007 kl. 11.21 skrev xiong:
Just like google: the more user clicks of search results,
the higher rank they are.
Are you really sure Google does this? It would surprise me if they
did.
I'm not sure, actually.
B
daniel rosher hotonline.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> This can be achieved by implementing your own implementation of the
> SortComparitorSource interface.
>
> Section 6.1 of Lucene in Action will help you here.
>
> We currently use this method to alter the ranking of documents depending
> on the
karl wettin gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> 15 mar 2007 kl. 11.21 skrev xiong:
>
> > Just like google: the more user clicks of search results,
> > the higher rank they are.
>
> Are you really sure Google does this? It would surprise me if they did.
>
I'm not sure, actually.
But using user feedbac
"Antony Bowesman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The writer method does not return the number of deleted documents. Is
> there a
> technical reason why this is not done.
>
> I am planning to see about converting my batch deletions using
> IndexReader to
> IndexWriter, but I'm currently using the
The writer method does not return the number of deleted documents. Is there a
technical reason why this is not done.
I am planning to see about converting my batch deletions using IndexReader to
IndexWriter, but I'm currently using the return value to record stats.
Does the following give th
Thanks a ton, Hoss. I just did an ant on the contrib/spellchecker
directory and it produced a jar file in the LUCENE_HOME/build/
directory. Replacing the old jar file with the new jar file fixed my
errrors as I suspected. Thanks, again.
-Ryan
On Mar 15, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Chris Hostetter
I'm looking for an Apache licensed SVM, preferably logistic. Is there
such a thing? Any suggestion for a better forum to ask this question?
--
karl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [
Nutch recently added a search query timeout (NUTCH-308). Are there any
plans to add such functionality to the Lucene HitCollector directly? Or
is there some reason that this is a bad idea?
I'm using Solr which doesn't seem to support search timeouts. It seems
that it would make sense to add
: Thanks for your insight, it matches my thoughts. The only reason I'm
: wondering is because the latest change in the lucene_2_1 branch is 4
: weeks old. So either no bugs were found since then (yeah!) or the bugs
: gets fixed in the trunk...
The general policy that Doug has encouraged in teh
That's really wonderful. Everything gets cleaner now.
Thanks, I mean really Thanks, for all the hard work that goes in Lucene
code + Doc + Processes + Mailing list. Lucene is really something I
refer other as "what (open source) software development should be".
I'll go with lucene_2_1 !
Jp
-
: My question basically was is there a spellchecker-2.*1*-rc1-dev.jar?
There *should* be a spellchecker 2.1 jar in the contrib/spellchecker/
directory of the 2.1 release.
-Hoss
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fo
> An index created with a formal version (major or minor), would be
readable
> (and hence upgradable) by a later version.
In fact this is not guaranteed for every "later version" - only for those
up to one major step ahead. The Wiki's statement is very accurate here:
File formats are back-comp
A good reason for applications to only use formal versions (vs. trunk) is
backwards compatibility (see "BackwardsCompatibility" in Lucene Wiki).
An index created with a formal version (major or minor), would be readable
(and hence upgradable) by a later version. But for interim trunk states
this i
15 mar 2007 kl. 15.33 skrev Ryan O'Hara:
My question basically was is there a spellchecker-2.*1*-rc1-dev.jar?
There has been changes since 2.0. You can also take a look at this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-632
The problems I'm having...
Exception:
java.lang.NullPointerE
I think you'd figure it all out if you just printed out the parsed query
with toString();
And have you looked at your index with Luke to see what you've
actually stored? And perhaps queried with Luke which, among
other things, will show you the query as parsed by various
analyzers? If you don't h
On Mar 15, 2007, at 12:27 AM, Antony Bowesman wrote:
Thanks for the detailed reponse Hoss. That's the sort of in depth
golden nugget I'd like to see in a copy of LIA 2 when it becomes
available...
NOTED! :)
Erik
-
Thanks for your insight, it matches my thoughts. The only reason I'm
wondering is because the latest change in the lucene_2_1 branch is 4
weeks old. So either no bugs were found since then (yeah!) or the bugs
gets fixed in the trunk...
I'll search JIRA and decides after!
Thanks!
Jp
-Origi
How to search numbers using Lucene API
I am using a demo application so as to search the documents but when i
search the numbers or alphanumeric text it appends an empty space and no
hits are returned any help would be appreciated
i am developing a new serach engine like Google .Currently it use
My question basically was is there a spellchecker-2.*1*-rc1-dev.jar?
The problems I'm having...
Exception:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.lucene.search.spell.SpellChecker.indexDictionary
(SpellChecker.java:298)
at DidYouMeanIndexer.createSpellIndex(DidYouMeanInd
Well, I think the standard disclaimer applies here: The trunk is not
guaranteed to be stable (but, hey, what really is, right?). Releases
are meant to be "production ready" to the best of our knowledge at
the time.
That being said, we do make efforts to keep the trunk stable. I
guess t
Hi,
Sorry for my delayed reply. I can't reproduce that OOM error with
MultiSearcher now.I'll try to reproduce that error and send you the details
that you asked.
I've tested to search my index with Multisearcher & separate
IndexSearcher.The search time by using Multisearcher is nearly equa
Hi,
This can be achieved by implementing your own implementation of the
SortComparitorSource interface.
Section 6.1 of Lucene in Action will help you here.
We currently use this method to alter the ranking of documents depending
on the age of the document by multiplying the current score by a ca
15 mar 2007 kl. 11.21 skrev xiong:
Just like google: the more user clicks of search results,
the higher rank they are.
Are you really sure Google does this? It would surprise me if they did.
How to implement this in lucene?
I've read the javadoc of org.apache.lucene.search package,
but
Hi there,
Just like google: the more user clicks of search results,
the higher rank they are.
How to implement this in lucene?
I've read the javadoc of org.apache.lucene.search package,
but still dont know how.
Some sample code will be great.
Thanks in advance,
Xiong
-
great!
a few words to refresh my memory, it's been a while...
- This patch lays only groundwork and should not cause any performance changes
in existing code per se, that is what we have tested extensively some months
ago (compatibility), it applied cleanly, passed all Junit tests and our
in
27 matches
Mail list logo
