Re: NO_NORMS and TOKENIZED?

On Feb 18, 2007, at 10:33 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: I don't suppose you have a mailing pointer to my old comments do you Marvin? http://tinyurl.com/394apl (mail-archives.apache.org) You're in good company. The other party with strong objections was Doug. http://tinyurl.com/36ucj2 en

Re: NO_NORMS and TOKENIZED?

: Heh. Your compadre Hoss is one of the most ardent opponents of fixed : field defs. :) : : I've been planning to ask him at some point how he might deal with : multidimensional data if he were forced to use KinoSearch's Schema/ : FieldSpec system. What say you, Hoss, can you think of something

Re: Lucene 2.1.0 release available

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18/02/2007 08:20:56: > Release 2.1.0 of Lucene is now available! > > Many new features, optimizations, and bug fixes have been added since 2.0, > including lazy field loading, simple deletes via IndexWriter, and lockless > readers/commits. > > The detailed change log is

Multiple time ranges in a document

Hello, I'm using a RangeFilter to find "Event" documents (with Start and End lucene friendly formatted date fields) that match a Users time range query. This works perfectly in sub-second times at decent loads, but I'm having trouble searching multiple performances in the one document. Indexing

Re: IndexSearcher on multi-core CPU machine

are you using Locale-sensitive sorting at all? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-806 Just wondering if you're seeing the same problem we are having. cheers, Paul Smith On 19/02/2007, at 8:52 AM, dmitri wrote: We have search (no update) web app on 2 dual core CPU machine (2x Du

IndexSearcher on multi-core CPU machine

We have search (no update) web app on 2 dual core CPU machine (2x Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280) with 8G of RAM. Lucene 2.0 is used. My index is optimized and non compound, 9G holding 6.5 M documents. Search includes term queries, range filters and sorts. When I use single IndexSearche

Re: the never ending class path problem

So, which class wasn't found? Indexfiles? And should that be IndexFiles? But check again that the path to the jars is exactly correct. I can't tell you how many times I've made a typo in something like that.. Often I resort to making a command file, and cut-n-paste from Windows Explorer addre

the never ending class path problem

I am hoping someone can tell me what I am doing wrong. I downloaded the demo for lucene, 2.1.0. I have put the core and demos jars in my class path and have confirmed they exist with a set command. My directory structure is: c:\documents and users\owner\workspace\lucene demo\src\demo\org\apa

Lucene 2.1.0 release available

Release 2.1.0 of Lucene is now available! Many new features, optimizations, and bug fixes have been added since 2.0, including lazy field loading, simple deletes via IndexWriter, and lockless readers/commits. The detailed change log is at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_

Re: Question about basic indexing performance improvements

Mike: It's Sunday morning and I felt like typing for a while, but the long rant can be summarized as follows... 1> be sure you know where you're spending your time before you implement a complex solution to the problem. I've been surprised many times that the actual problem was nowhere near wher

Re: Question about basic indexing performance improvements

Le dimanche 18 février 2007 04:38, Mike O'Leary a écrit : > I am taking a class in which the professor has assigned a project to take a > question answering application that was submitted by a team of students to > one of the TREC contests last year and turn it into a teaching tool. One > thing he