Re: Modifying StandardAnalyzer

Figures...I don't even think removing those pieces from OR will work...that will just skip both pieces because they will appear as pure numbers. What you want is a bit tricky. I will think about it if someone else doesn't chime in...it is difficult to recognize one token and then return it as t

Re: Excluding partial match for query result

Sure, see PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper. It's designed to allow different analyzers for different fields. Erick On 1/12/07, M A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Analyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(new String[]{}); The analyzer used in both cases, would be this one in the code, above. Does this mean

Re: Modifying StandardAnalyzer

It won't do what I need. I may have something like: "All-In-One is located in 92226-4446 and has an E-A-R" I want it to be tokenized as follows: all one located 92226 4446 E-A-R Right now... it is tokenizing it as this: all one located 92226-4446 E-A-R Thats the type of information you

RE: Modifying StandardAnalyzer

It won't do what I need. I may have something like: "All-In-One is located in 92226-4446 and has an E-A-R" I want it to be tokenized as follows: all one located 92226 4446 E-A-R Right now... it is tokenizing it as this: all one located 92226-4446 E-A-R -Original Message- From: Eric

Re: Excluding partial match for query result

Analyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(new String[]{}); The analyzer used in both cases, would be this one in the code, above. Does this mean i would have to create a new Analyzer and reindex the whole lot? Bearing in mind ofcourse that there is also a free text element also, See this become

Re: Technology Preview of new Lucene QueryParser

: I will certainly start experimenting with this. For clarification : though, you are telling me that the Lucene syntax query: 'Mark AND pig : AND man' is different than the query: '(Mark AND pig) AND man', correct? Ummm... because you are making all of the clauses required, the parens *may* not

Re: Technology Preview of new Lucene QueryParser

: This sounds troubling to me now :) I may need to clear up my : understanding of this and rework the parser: : "A | B | C ! D ! E" wold get parsed as allFields:a allFields:b : (+allFields:c -allFields:d -allFields:e) : This is because ! binds tighter than |... : Sounds like I need to bone up on

Re: wilcard search with terms contains _ or -

Wildcard queries are not analyzed...they are only lowercased unless you have changed that behavior. - Mark Supriya Kumar Shyamal wrote: Hi, I have problem searching wildcards terms contains _ or -. When I search for non-linear I see the query as title:"non linear" but when I search for non-

wilcard search with terms contains _ or -

Hi, I have problem searching wildcards terms contains _ or -. When I search for non-linear I see the query as title:"non linear" but when I search for non-lin* I get the query as title:non-lin* and it does not return any result as it interprets as single token with wildcard. I have gone thro

Re: Lucene 1.3

Thanks a bunch, Grant and Koji Best Regards, Kunal Grant Ingersoll wrote: Hi Kunal, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/tags/ should have all the past versions you could ever desire. -Grant On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Kunal Taneja wrote: Can somebody, please let me know if it it po

RE: Lucene 1.3

Hi Kunal, You can get them from subversion repository. For example, for Lucene 1.3: $ svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_1_3_final See also: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/SourceRepository http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/tags/ regards, Koji -

Re: Lucene 1.3

Hi Kunal, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/tags/ should have all the past versions you could ever desire. -Grant On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Kunal Taneja wrote: Can somebody, please let me know if it it possible to get the source code for Lucene version 1.3 and other earlier ver

Lucene 1.3

Can somebody, please let me know if it it possible to get the source code for Lucene version 1.3 and other earlier versions. I need them for research purpose. Best Regards, Kunal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo

Re: How to retrieve the document by document ID?

David, please look at the Javadoc for IndexReader. I believe the API is reader.document(int), where reader is an instance of IndexReader. Otis - Original Message From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 3:10:42 AM Subject: How to re

How to retrieve the document by document ID?

Hi all: How do Lucene give each document an ID when the document is added and How do we retrieve a document by document ID? appreciate your help! -- David