Hi,
I recently run the FieldNormModifier (see
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-741 ) on 8 fields that I wanted to
turn into NO_NORMS fields. I run this on several optimized .cfs indices.
Afterwards I noticed that *some* (but not all!) indices contained 8 .sN (where
N is a number)
Thanks Mike, you are right. There was a really bad test method that didn't
clean up after itself. Thanks for the heads up. This was not a Lucene
problem, it was just me not going through all of the unit test methods.
On 1/8/07, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
S Edirisinghe wrote:
S Edirisinghe wrote:
I'm having a write lock problem when I try to open an existing index.
When I try to open the index with the recreate set to false, I get this
exception
java.io.IOException: Lock obtain timed out: Lock@/tmp/lucene-
e683c0b3e52b8094bba62b22617efd41-write.lock
at org.apache
No, I haven't compared it to a local index, but when working on other
projects in the past I've always seen that "chatty" remote access can really
hurt performance, and that batching up multiple calls into a single remote
access saves a lot of time.
Alex
--
View this message in context:
http:/
I am trying to use the build from Jan. 5, 2007 to incorporate with Solr (
compiled using javac 1.5.0_02 on Solaris). When I try to add a new document
to the index, I always get a class def found error.
Posting file vidcard.xml to http://localhost:8983/solr/update
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
Hello,
I'm having a write lock problem when I try to open an existing index.
When I try to open the index with the recreate set to false, I get this
exception
java.io.IOException: Lock obtain timed out: Lock@/tmp/lucene-
e683c0b3e52b8094bba62b22617efd41-write.lock
at org.apache.lucene.store.L
On Monday 08 January 2007 23:08, sashaman wrote:
> Can anyone comment on this performance issue?
Have you compared to a local index? It's not uncommon for several doc()
calls to take more time than searching, as doc() requires a lot I/O, even
locally.
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnabe
I have a question about the performance of the following Lucene setup:
I have a MultiSearcher that contains 3 RemoteSearchables that point to
IndexSearchables on 3 different boxes, and each index contains about 20,000
docs. When an end user runs a search, results are displayed with 20 hits per
pa
Hi, Chris,
Thanks. Does this page provides the right equation for span query based
similarity?
http://xtf.sourceforge.net/docs/underHood.html#Scoring
Jianhan
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2007 08:20
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
S
You can try DBSight. It's using a lucene+database+website domain
specific approach to facilitate rapid index design. It's used by
Computer Science Corporation for some military information project,
and websites like www.twenga.com.
--
Chris Lu
-
Instant Full-Text Search On
Jmeter
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
In Lucene in Action we covered testing/monitoring performance with JUnitPerf:
http://lucenebook.com/search?query=testing+performance , so that's one way of
doing it.
I've also written multi-threaded search benchmarking app that keeps the
concurrency level const
Why test? LOL. just release your software and you'll find the answer, at
least that is what I did:)
www.megueii.com
On 1/8/07, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In Lucene in Action we covered testing/monitoring performance with
JUnitPerf: http://lucenebook.com/search?query=testing+pe
In Lucene in Action we covered testing/monitoring performance with JUnitPerf:
http://lucenebook.com/search?query=testing+performance , so that's one way of
doing it.
I've also written multi-threaded search benchmarking app that keeps the
concurrency level constant, goes through a log of queries
Well, my testing mostly consisted of capacity testing. I'm using XmlRpc as
my communication mechanism and simply fired up a (configurable) number of
threads to pound my search service with semi-random queries and measured the
response time. Your results may vary depending on how your index is
stru
Hi luceners, I don't have any question today.
Simply I want to know how you test the efficiency of yours systems that
works over Lucene.
I think it will be a very interesting for all newbie (like me) in Lucene
world some advices in this point.
Thanks in advance.
Steal the FunctionQuery from Solr. In the past, Hoss has provided some
examples of how it can be used either on this or on solr-user/dev list.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Bhavin Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 8, 2007 7:01:08 PM
Subjec
Max,
We use a (customized version of) Lucene as part of our Cognocys IAM
product, which is also available with Oracle RDBMS.
I can tell you that the software is used at Medtronic, a global medical
technology company.
-h
---
Max:
The code of the Oracle-Lucene integration is in a very early stage,
see the first patch released (22/Nov/06 03:44 PM), but it uses the
lucene-2.0.0 core API which is very stable.
I don't know if somebody is using the code, but I testing it a lot
with small and large test suites and seem t
Hello Marcelo,
Thanks for the details of your implementation. I was wondering if you
could share where this implementation is taking place. Also, are you
aware of any implementations at companies or government agencies where
Lucene was used to index Oracle.
My client is thinking about implementi
Hi Max:
I am working in a Oracle-Lucene integration, see patch:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-724
Today I'll upload a latest development release which includes
several performance enhancement and new methods to integrate with the
Oracle Data Cartridge API without using data informa
Hello,
Does anyone know of instances where Lucene was used to index Oracle
RDBMS at a recognizable company or a government agency? Powered by
Lucene list did not seem to have any such examples
Thanks for your help!
Max
-
To uns
Hello guys,
I think i have posted this questions earlier but didnt got satisfied answer...
I have a index...in which document has one field "update timestamp" ...
Index is gettting update daily
now when someone searches for "usa" i wants result mixing of "recent +
relevant". ...
I tried by
this is covered in the FAQ if you look for "search within search" ...
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ
: Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:49:47 +0530
: From: maarsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
: To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Searching the resu
: The equation for similarity is given on this web page:
: http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/Similari
: ty.html
:
: I would like to know what are the equations for similarity if the query
: is a span or boolean query.
That equation does cover BooleanQueries -- the "c
24 matches
Mail list logo