Let me see if I have a clue what you're trying to do. Warning: I'm a bit
confused since "filter" has a very specific meaning in Lucene, so when you
talk about filters I'm assuming that you're NOT talking about Lucene
filters, but rather just a set of flags you're associating with each
document, an
Hello,
I am currently evaluating Lucene to see if it would be appropriate to
replace my company's current search software. So far everything has been
looking great, however there is one requirement that I am not too
certain about.
What we need to do is to be able to store a bit mask specifying
Interesting that the article references a post I made here. In the end
I did not end up needing that lucene code change for two reasons.
1) I ended up just clustering the RAMDirectory itself so the subclass
of the collection ended up not being shared
2) In the coming release (early december) we'l
On Thursday 09 November 2006 19:55, Renaud Waldura wrote:
> I'm thinking I might have to tokenize the document text (I have it),
> then compute the intersection between the set of all terms and the set
> of terms from the rewritten query. Blech. Sounds expensive. Any other
> ideas?
No faster, but
Greetings:
I read the mailing-list archives about this topic and found the PDFBox
solutions at: http://www.pdfbox.org/userguide/highlighting.html
Basically there are 3 options:
1- append query parameters to the PDF URL
2- generate a highlight XML document that Acrobat Reader will download
separa
Some people might find this interesting. I have personally not looked
at it in depth:
Engineers at TerraCotta have detailed a new way to cluster lucene,
the popular text search library from Apache. Their method involves
implementing the lucene RAMDirectory interface and using TerraCotta
D
Okay, so no help with the JGuruMultisearcher...How about something more
specific:
It seems easy enough to just copy The JGuruMS method of keeping a an array
of Weight's around and feeding a different one to
each subsearcher...I am worried about the following method though...I am
guessing that thi
I think it's pretty straighforward: the 'custom search engine' is
essentially the 'filter' that can also modify score weights of found
documents. I'd say 'coop engine' + 'your query' should be relatively
easily reducted into your 'your extended query', once you subsitute
'coop engine' with 'query p
Hi,
How do we use a specific query on multiple fields ?
for eg.
I have to run a query "jakarta tomcat" (the string which i give in my
textbox is with double quotes as I have to get the string 'jakarta tomcat'
together)
on mutiple fields like "content" ,"title","examples"
Take a look at org.a
Well, if I think you can create three PhraseQueries and combine them in a
BooleanQuery with SHOULD. That is
PhraseQuery pq1 = new PhraseQuery();
pq1.add(new Term("content", "jakarta tomcat"));
pq2.add(new Term("title", "jakarta tomcat"));
BooleanQuery bq = new BooleanQuery();
bq.add(pq1, Boolean
Hi All,
How do we use a specific query on multiple fields ?
for eg.
I have to run a query "jakarta tomcat" (the string which i give in my
textbox is with double quotes as I have to get the string 'jakarta tomcat'
together)
on mutiple fields like "content" ,"title","examples"
Also if I have a
How can I manipulate the score depending on the combination of query
terms containing in the result document? Not a single term is important.
That could be boosted. Important is the combination of terms.
The user searches for the terms A, B, C and D.
Of-course, the document containing all terms
Hi,
: I want "Überraschung" is found by
:
: Überr*
: Ueberr*
:
: So the best i can do is to do the normalisation manually(not by an
: analyzer) before the indexing/searching process?
Or use an Analyzer at index time that puts both the UTF-8 version of the
string and the Latin-1 version of the st
13 matches
Mail list logo
