In our application we have multiple fields that are searched. So fast car
becomes:
+(field1:fast field2:fast field3:fast) +(field1:car field2:car field3:car)
I understand that the default sqrt implementation of tf() would help the
"lopsided score" phenomenon with searches within the same field.
On Monday 18 September 2006 23:08, Andy Liu wrote:
> For multi-word queries, I would like to reward documents that contain a more
> even distribution of each word and penalize documents that have a skewed
> distribution. For example, if my search query is:
>
> +content:fast +content:car
>
> I wo
For multi-word queries, I would like to reward documents that contain a more
even distribution of each word and penalize documents that have a skewed
distribution. For example, if my search query is:
+content:fast +content:car
I would prefer a document that contains each word an equal number of
Hi guys. A bit of self-promotion; I hope nobody will consider it rude,
after all Carrot2 is a plugin to Nutch and some folks use it with
Lucene, so I thought it may be of relevance to both lists.
Of course we invite everyone to try the demo on-line. Number of daily
queries to Yahoo is limite
Jason Polites wrote:
I've also seen FileNotFound exceptions when attempting a search on an index
while it's being updated, and the searcher is in a different JVM. This is
supposed to be supported, but on Windows seems to regularly fail (for me
anyway).
Note that this use case (accessing one sh
Thanks, I definitely missed this. Makes it a lot more simpler to use...
Appreciate your help Chris.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 08:26 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: best way to get specific re
: I have downloaded the last nightly build. I was looking for an
: interesting method I found in the javadoc (Explanation.getSummary()) but
: I found nothing similar, only getDescription() and getDetails(), which
: were already present in v2.0. Is this method still to be added? Or has
: it been di
: Thanks for the info on this. Since I should use the search function that
: returns TopDocs, I was wondering what was the proper way to create a
: Weight object to pass into the search function.
I think you are getting too hung up on the method summary section of the
IndexSearcher javadocs ... I
Thanks a lot!!!
I have downloaded the last nightly build. I was looking for an
interesting method I found in the javadoc (Explanation.getSummary()) but
I found nothing similar, only getDescription() and getDetails(), which
were already present in v2.0. Is this method still to be added? Or has
Thanks for the info on this. Since I should use the search function that
returns TopDocs, I was wondering what was the proper way to create a
Weight object to pass into the search function.
There are 2 functions in the Query class that I see: createWeight and
weight, which both return a Weight ob
Hi Luis,
Chris Hostetter wrote:
> Luis Rodrigo Aguado wrote:
> : I've been looking through the documentation in the official
> : web-site, and the Javadoc belongs to v2.1, that I could not find
> : anywhere, anyone has a clue about where to find it or when will it be
> : officially released?
>
Ah, that might be it! I store the date directly as a string in the form
"MMddhhmm". I will try DateTools...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 18 september 2006 16:51
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting on date in a frequently
i suspect this has everything to do with the specifics of how you are
adding the date field to the Documents before you index them ... are you
using DateTools? what Resolution are you specifying?
keep in mind that the "stored" date value you see isn't neccessarily the
exact same thing as the "ind
: Date: Fri, 04 Jan 1980 10:49:34 +0100
: Subject: Versions
1) you should fix your clock.
2) ...
: I've been looking through the documentation in the official
: web-site, and the Javadoc belongs to v2.1, that I could not find
: anywhere, anyone has a clue about where to find it or when will
Hi all,
I've been looking through the documentation in the official
web-site, and the Javadoc belongs to v2.1, that I could not find
anywhere, anyone has a clue about where to find it or when will it be
officially released?
Thanks!
I've also seen FileNotFound exceptions when attempting a search on an index
while it's being updated, and the searcher is in a different JVM. This is
supposed to be supported, but on Windows seems to regularly fail (for me
anyway).
The simplest solution to this would be a service oriented approa
I'm experiencing problems getting sort to work correctly The result is not
completely out of order, but it is certainly not correct. I have an index with
the following fields:
idstored, un_tokenized
headerstored, tokenized
body stored, tokenized
keywords stored, tokenized
date
It is not currently possible to create an index without term position
information.
Support for such a feature was mentioned as part of some long term objectives
for more flexible indexing -
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/FlexibleIndexing
Some debate here:
http://www.archivum.info/java-d
> Hi everybody,
>
> is it possible to store fields without term position (the
> .prx file) data? We store sort of custom data in the field
> and use it as some sort of a filter for queries, so we just
> don't need any term position data and it bloats the index'
> size nearly by factor 3.
Does
20 matches
Mail list logo
