On 7/23/06, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm want to filter words with a dash in them.
["x-men"]
["xmen"]
["x", "men"]
All of above should be synonyms. The problem is ["x", "men"] requiring a
distance between the terms and thus also matching "x-men men".
WordDelimiterFilter from Sol
On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 21:31 -0500, Charlie wrote:
> Would anyone give me a hint regarding the natural language expression
> of the following span query?
> spanNear([spanOr([spanNear([field:six, field:hundred], 0, true),
> spanNear([field:seven, field:hundred], 0, true)]),
> spanOr([field:seven, fi
On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 21:24 -0500, Herbert Wu wrote:
> WhitespaceAnalyzer looks brutal. Is it possible that I keep
> StandardAnalyzer and at the same time to tell the parser to keep a
> list of chars during indexing?
Add something like:
| < #MYCHARACTERS:
("&" | ":" | "%" | ";")
>
to t
Would anyone give me a hint regarding the natural language expression
of the following span query?
if creating queries programmatically (it is in Lucene scr)
SpanTermQuery t1 = new SpanTermQuery(new Term("field","six"));
SpanTermQuery t2 = new SpanTermQuery(new Term("field","h
WhitespaceAnalyzer looks brutal. Is it possible that I keep StandardAnalyzer
and at the same time to tell the parser to keep a list of chars during
indexing?
-Herbert
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 10:56 AM
To: java-user@luc
On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 14:44 -0700, vasu shah wrote:
> I have few doubts
> The index size will approximately increase by 4000 records per
> day. Is lucene good for the application?
Sure.
> Is it suitable for frequent inserts/updates?
Sure, but I don't consider 4000 new documents per day to be
I'm want to filter words with a dash in them.
["x-men"]
["xmen"]
["x", "men"]
All of above should be synonyms. The problem is ["x", "men"] requiring a
distance between the terms and thus also matching "x-men men". Or? How
about storing ["x", "men"] as the first term and the use set a negative
pos
Hello Everyone,
We have an application and the current search is taking lot of time to return
the results. We are doing a search against 8-9 database tables and 1.5 million
records.
I want to increase the search speed and thinking of implementing lucene search.
I went through the documentation
Hi everybody,
im currently trying to figure out how to implement another score model in the
lucene framework. But after reading a lot of source code and a little
debugging it seems like i have to write a lot of score-classes -- for each
query type one.
And finally i need to get lucene to use my
the WhitespaceAnalyzer breaks up streams on whitespace, and will give you
these characters as tokens. Be careful to use it for indexing AND searching.
Also, make sure that's the analyzer in Luke if you submit queries that way
(it's a drop-down on the search page, upper right as I remember).
On 7/
Both of these topics have been discussed at length in this forum. I think
you would be well served by searching the archive for both of these topics,
and you'd get your answer faster .
NFS mounts have problems that have been discussed recently.
There is nothing built into Lucene that indexes
11 matches
Mail list logo
