Would Lucene's FuzzyQuery be useful in this case? I
suppose it would depend on how meaningful the
sequences of numbers are.
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/FuzzyQuery.html
--- Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : I could (1) up front, put in both vers
: particular author using the query. That is for documents returned by
: querying: (content:"miracle cure"), I would like to reduce the
: relevancy of authorid:3024
: +(content:"miracle cure") +(authorid:3024^0.5 ((-authorid:3024))^10.0)
: => The boosted optional prohibited term seems to have no e
I have a index from which I have a number of documents from authors,
but would like to drop the relevance/score for documents from one
particular author using the query. That is for documents returned by
querying: (content:"miracle cure"), I would like to reduce the
relevancy of authorid:3024
How
: I'm storing a field in an index with that option
: (Field.Index.UN_TOKENZIED).
the key to understanding your problem, is to realize that...
UN_TOKENIZED == Not Analyzed
...personally, i think name of the constant is missleading.
: The String that is being stored is: NORTH SAFETY PR
: I could (1) up front, put in both versions of the numbers or (2) during
: query, play with the number and search both ways. What's the best
: practice approach?
In the imortal words of Erik Hatcher...
"It Depends :)"
#1 takes up more space on disk and in memory, and makes it imposibl
Furash: welcome to Lucene. I suspect you'll find it extremely
advantageous to pick up a copy of "Lucene In Action" it has a lot of great
examples that may help you understand some of these questions...
: token string). But what I want to do is something like IF this is just
: a string of more t
I'm storing a field in an index with that option
(Field.Index.UN_TOKENZIED).
The String that is being stored is: NORTH SAFETY PRODUCT (all uppercase)
When I try a wildcard query against that field, it only produces results
if the query term is capitalized.
I'm using the StandardAnalyz
The lock time out exception is caused by trying to open multiple
IndexWriter objects in parallel - each of the 5 threads is creating its own
IndexWriter object in each invocation of addAndIndex(). This cannot work -
I think that chapter 2.9 of "Lucene in Action" is essential reading for
fixing this
That worked... thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Michael D. Curtin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 1:04 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: BooleanQuery question
Van Nguyen wrote:
> I just want results that have:
>
> ID: 1234 OR 2344 OR 2323
>
> LOCA
Norms are per indexed-field. For every document it's the product of
the lengthNorm and the index-time boost. It's really more of an
implementation detail that you shouldn't need to know about unless you
have a lot of indexed fields and want to omit them for memory reasons.
See DefaultSimilarity
Use PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper
- Original Message
From: Furash Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 11:56:04 AM
Subject: How do you use a different analyzer by field?
Maybe I'm approaching this wrong (apologies) and didn't search correctly
thr
For some things, it's obvious that you would have to put them both on
the front end (during indexing) and on the back end. E.g., if you want
to do a soundex search, you'd want to encode the words with their
soundex version during index creation, and when you query incode the
user's search input as
I'm guessing they're neither the guy from Cheers nor the sociology term
;-)
The examples have you creating them before you do searches. What are
they? The javadoc doesn't really explain their function (or at least
not in a way I could figure out). Thanks.
G
---
Maybe I'm approaching this wrong (apologies) and didn't search correctly
through the archives (mia culpa), but...
If I want to apply a different analyzer to different fields in the
document, how do I do that? It seems like when you create the index you
pass it an analyzer, and that's the one you'
Thanks, Eric.
Vlad
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 11:45 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene-In-Action book - any details?..
Vlad,
You're right - LIA 1st edition was written for Lucene 1.4.x. All of the
c
Vlad,
You're right - LIA 1st edition was written for Lucene 1.4.x. All of
the code works fine with Lucene 1.9 (with deprecation warnings that
can be safely ignored), but documented tweaks are necessary to get
the LIA code to compile with Lucene 2.0.
The coverage of the basics and archite
Hi,
Can anyone, pls, advise, based on which version of Lucene the 'Lucene in
Action' book is written? I've looked at various releases
(http://gulus.usherbrooke.ca/pub/appl/apache/lucene/java/archive/), and
it seems like there was a big gap between 1.4 and 1.9 release (over a
year), with 1.4 relea
Big fan of lucene already. Just looking for some advice, with apologies
in advance if it's been already answerd in the list and I just didn't
search right.
1. Lets say I want to store a term in MORE than one way: e.g., I want to
store the soundex version of a word and the real version of a word.
i fix it...when i "import org.apache.lucene.demo.FileDocument;"
and thk u for ur answer.
2006/7/10, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: when i try javac Package: org.apache.lucene.demo;
: name is IndexFiles.java
:
: it show me : FileDocument ,error info : cannot resolve symbol
:
:
: how c
On Jul 9, 2006, at 8:29 AM, dan2000 wrote:
yes, myField is a tokenized field. I've used ChineseAnalyzer. here
is an
examle text ??
Let me explain what exactly what I want.
myField is a tokenized field:
new Field("key",key, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED)
I sometimes need to find
Here is the simplified code that causes problem (Lock obtain timed out).
MyIndexer is used for indexing and searching. IndexTest starts 5 threads for
indexing and 100 threads for searching.
MyIndexer.java
public class MyIndexer
{
File m_IndexFile;
IndexReader m_IndexReader;
Directory
These two threads may be educational...
http://www.nabble.com/OutOfMemory-error-while-sorting-tf1785358.html#a4862471
http://www.nabble.com/MemoryUsage-of-sorting-tf1861157.html#a5083259
: Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 15:50:30 +0800
: From: yuexiang zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Reply-To: java-user@luce
: when i try javac Package: org.apache.lucene.demo;
: name is IndexFiles.java
:
: it show me : FileDocument ,error info : cannot resolve symbol
:
:
: how can i compile it?
The supported method for compiling Lucene is to use the ant build.xml
file. If you take a look at the BUILD.txt file you'll
23 matches
Mail list logo
