On May 29, 2006, at 05:20, Bill Janssen wrote:
I'm not sure I understand just what ZOE does, but it doesn't seem to
be an IMAP server.
ZOË can access an IMAP server to index it, but doesn't act as an IMAP
server itself even though it provides other services (e.g. HTTP, SMTP,
POP, FTP, etc).
Thank You, for your reply. I will try to write the code. After that i will
let you know.
Regards
Sajid
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A+Query+Contains+All+The+Symbols-t1691532.html#a4606464
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com.
Hi Lucene experts,
I'm having a problem with Sort performance during searches. I'm using
Lucene 1.9.1.
I need to Sort by a date field in the document. When I use the
default Sort.RELEVANCE, query response time is ~6ms. However, when I
specify a sort, e.g. Searcher.search( query, new Sort( "my
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 20:20 -0700, Bill Janssen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've got oodles of email stored in MH (one file per message,
> hierarchical directories) format. I'm looking for an IMAP server that
> will use Lucene to index that mail and perform the various search
> parts of the IMAP protocol.
Hi!
I've got oodles of email stored in MH (one file per message,
hierarchical directories) format. I'm looking for an IMAP server that
will use Lucene to index that mail and perform the various search
parts of the IMAP protocol. Ideally, the mail would not have to be
converted to another email f
If you can use all that memory for index, I would say RAM. For long running
indexes (to get os cache populated), MMAP will do just as good if you have any
file system worth using.
- Original Message
From: Michael Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 28
Hi,
On a 64-bit platform with 30gb RAM and 8 real CPUs, should
MMapDirectory or RAMDirectory provide better search performance on a
5gb index?
Cheers,
Michael
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
