Hi,
I have added some code in the Lucene 1.9 - source code for Lucene
RemoteParallelMultisearcher performance benchmark.
I have recorded the time to execute the 'searchables[i].docFreq(term)' (in
MultiSearcher.java) method in both client and server, and for '
searchable.search' (in ParallelMul
Makes sense. Thanks for the response!
--Bill
On 4/26/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> : Why does DateTools.dateToString() return a String representation of my
> Date,
> : but in a different TimeZone. Does it use its own Calendar/TimeZone
> settings?
>
> Yes, DateTime is hardco
27 apr 2006 kl. 02.18 skrev Andy Goodell:
For my application we have several hundred indexes, different subsets
of which are searched depending on the situation. Aside from not
upgrading to lucene 1.9, or making a big index for every possible
subset, do you have any ideas for how can we mainta
For my application we have several hundred indexes, different subsets
of which are searched depending on the situation. Aside from not
upgrading to lucene 1.9, or making a big index for every possible
subset, do you have any ideas for how can we maintain fast
performance?
- andy g
On 4/26/06, Da
Are the names of a field in a document unique or can i make a field with
the name "sentence" for each sentence in an text document?
Grant Ingersoll schrieb:
Anton,
I think there are at least a couple of ways of doing this. I assume
you have a program that does sentence detection already, as
On Mittwoch 26 April 2006 01:22, RONALD MANTAY wrote:
> However when searching muliple indexes with multiSearcher and with a
> FuzzyQuery with a prefixLength of 1. The search against 3.7m documents
> spread over 23 indexes (due to the natural grouping of the data) the
> time changed from 800ms t
>
>
> So I guess its done by writing or extending an anylzer?
>
Yes...thats correct.
--Rajesh Munavalli
Blog: http://munavalli.blogspot.com
Rajesh Munavalli schrieb:
On 4/26/06, Hannes Carl Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I would like enable users to do an acronym search on my index.
My idea is the following:
1.) Extract acronyms (ABS, ESP, VCG etc.) from the given document (which
is going to be indexed)
In cas
On 4/26/06, Hannes Carl Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I would like enable users to do an acronym search on my index.
> My idea is the following:
>
> 1.) Extract acronyms (ABS, ESP, VCG etc.) from the given document (which
> is going to be indexed)
In case you havent already loo
Is this markedly faster than using an MMapDirectory? Copying all this
data into the Java heap (as RAMDirectory does) puts a tremendous burden
on the garbage collector. MMapDirectory should be nearly as fast, but
keeps the index out of the Java heap.
Doug
z shalev wrote:
I've rewritten
This makes perfect sense to me. Of course the hard part will be how to
extract the acronyms.
-- Stefan
Hannes Carl Meyer wrote:
Hi All,
I would like enable users to do an acronym search on my index.
My idea is the following:
1.) Extract acronyms (ABS, ESP, VCG etc.) from the given document
Hi
how do i display the whole field value of an document the query string
is found?
cheers
anton
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
I would like enable users to do an acronym search on my index.
My idea is the following:
1.) Extract acronyms (ABS, ESP, VCG etc.) from the given document (which
is going to be indexed)
2.) Store the extracted acronyms in a field, for example called "case"
3.) On search, asking the u
Greetings,
If I write a filter, does this run over the documents in the index *before*
a search is made (i.e., every document in the index is touched) or on the
result set after the search? If it is run over all of the documents, doesn't
this become a performance bottleneck on any non-trivial filt
: I'm sure the guys will chime in, but I think you're in significant danger of
: getting a "too many clauses" exception thrown. Try searching on, say, "an".
: Under the covers, Lucene expands your query to have a clause for *every*
: item in your index that starts with "an", so there's a clause fo
: Why does DateTools.dateToString() return a String representation of my Date,
: but in a different TimeZone. Does it use its own Calendar/TimeZone settings?
Yes, DateTime is hardcoded to use GMT for it's string representations.
It wouldn't be safe for DateTools to use your current TimeZone/Loca
Hello,
Why does DateTools.dateToString() return a String representation of my Date,
but in a different TimeZone. Does it use its own Calendar/TimeZone settings?
F.I.
DateFormat format = new SimpleDateFormat("-MM-dd hh:mm:ss.SSS");
System.out.println(DateTools.dateToString(format.parse("2006-
I'm sure the guys will chime in, but I think you're in significant danger of
getting a "too many clauses" exception thrown. Try searching on, say, "an".
Under the covers, Lucene expands your query to have a clause for *every*
item in your index that starts with "an", so there's a clause for "an" "a
Hi,
I'm about to write a little command-line Lucene search benchmark tool. I'm
interested in benchmarking search performance and the ability to specify
concurrency level (# of parallel search threads) and response timing, so I can
calculate min, max, average, and mean times. Something like 'a
Steve,
There are some locks involved in search, like the one that gets written to the
FS before the readers reads all the segment/index files listed in segments
file. Once they are all read, the lock is released. Setting lock dir to the
local /tmp doesn't sound good, as locks have to be in th
Hi All,
Just wanted to throw out something I'm working on. It is working well for me,
but I wanted to see if anyone can suggest any other alternatives that might
perform better than what I'm doing now.
I have a field in my index that contains keywords (back of the book index
terms) and a UI fe
ok, thanks for letting me know.
I entered a bug, 556.
javi
On 4/26/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> This went to the old mailing list...
> Could you email this to java-user@lucene.apache.org
> and maybe open a JIRA bug for it?
>
> -Yonik
>
> On 4/26/06, jm <[EMAIL PROTECT
On 4/26/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> This went to the old mailing list...
> Could you email this to java-user@lucene.apache.org
> and maybe open a JIRA bug for it?
>
> -Yonik
>
> On 4/26/06, jm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have encountered an issue with
Hi Jim,
This went to the old mailing list...
Could you email this to java-user@lucene.apache.org
and maybe open a JIRA bug for it?
-Yonik
On 4/26/06, jm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have encountered an issue with lucene1.9.1. It involves
> MatchAllDocsQuery, MultiSearcher and a custom
Hi,
I have encountered an issue with lucene1.9.1. It involves
MatchAllDocsQuery, MultiSearcher and a custom HitCollector. The
following code throws java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException.
If I remove the MatchAllDocsQuery condition (comment whole //1
block), or if I dont use the custom hitcoll
I've rewritten the RAM DIR to supprt 64 bit (still havent had time to add this
to lucene, hopefully in the coming months when i have a free second)
My question:
i have a machine with 4 GB RAM
i have a 3GB index file,
i successfully load the 3GB index into memory,
the
Hi
I wrote a program that make a pdf document to an Lucene document. The
field ate "contents", "sentence", :
How do i display the sentence the query String is in? and how do I
Highlight the String?
cheers
anton feldmann
package de.coli.seek.lucene;
import java.io.File;
import java.io
Hey,
I'm running into this exception with my lucene searching. We have a cluster of
2 servers that execute searches and one server in the back end that writes to
the index. I thought that setting up the external boxes on nfs would be
alright since searching doesn't require locking. Can anyo
I have met a error like this:"Cannot save index to 'index' directory, please
delete it first" when I run the demo in lucene1.9.1.
please tell me why?
i hava set classpath!
--
『忙忙碌碌 ★ 碌碌无为』
一只小蚂蚁
http://blog.csdn.net/qixiang_nj
I guess that fixes the problem.
Thanx
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/search-problem-t1506294.html#a4096490
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
30 matches
Mail list logo
