Thanks, It works, I took binary jar from Luke site
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 8:25 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: More than 32 required/prohibited clauses in query
On Dec 27, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Murali
Good evening everyone,
So, I apologize if this question has a simple answer (although I hope it
does). I am trying to apply a filter to an IndexReader, so that the reader
can only see documents that match the filter. The goal here is to be able to
implement the 'terms' and 'termDocs' methods, with
On Dec 27, 2005, at 5:51 PM, Dmitry Goldenberg wrote:
This is great. Now, just so I understand how rewrite applies. Are
there specific cases when the rewrite method should or should not
be invoked on the query before it is passed on to the search
method? Where I'm going with this is, if
Erik,
This is great. Now, just so I understand how rewrite applies. Are there
specific cases when the rewrite method should or should not be invoked on the
query before it is passed on to the search method? Where I'm going with this
is, if I have a UI which passes the user query to the back e
If anyone could provide a testcase that can reproduce this, it would
be a huge step toward fixing it!
-Yonik
On 12/27/05, Chris Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have got around it by using two indexes, one for searching, one for
> updating.
> But searching "FileNotFoundException lucene" returns
I have got around it by using two indexes, one for searching, one for updating.
But searching "FileNotFoundException lucene" returns some previous emails.
Problems are more often on windows.
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg11689.html
http://mail-archives.apache.org/m
On Dec 27, 2005, at 2:34 PM, Dmitry Goldenberg wrote:
What do you mean by _rewriting_ the query? I checked all the
classes in the highlighter package and did not see any mention of
having to rewrite.
From Highlighter's package.html in it's javadocs:
IndexSearcher searcher = new I
Erik,
What do you mean by _rewriting_ the query? I checked all the classes in the
highlighter package and did not see any mention of having to rewrite.
Sorry for the highjacking, didn't mean to be a terrorist :)
- Dmitry
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Hello,
Trying to get my field searches to work with special characters. It appears
that Lucene is not able to interpret these searches correctly (but works as
expected with generic content searches).
For instance, I created a document named item+with+pluses (plus being the
special character t
Hello,
While testing my code that integrates the Highlighter class from
org.apache.lucene.search.highlight, I found out that for wildcard and fuzzy
queries, it generates no best fragments.
Any particular reason why that is the case? Shouldn't the highlighter be able
to work just like with any
Erik, thanks for the quick response. I believe we had an analyzer discrepancy.
I just retested and the queries work.
I see "character encode eliminate"~3 and "character encoding eliminates"~3
returning the same results.
Thanks!
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EM
You have to _rewrite_ the Query for this to work. This, I believe,
is mentioned in the javadocs.
I think you are hijacking a thread with your recent postings. Please
create a new message rather than reply to one and change the
subject. Thanks.
Erik
On Dec 27, 2005, at 1:55 PM
Hello,
While testing my code that integrates the Highlighter class from
org.apache.lucene.search.highlight, I found out that for wildcard and fuzzy
queries, it generates no best fragments.
Any particular reason why that is the case? Shouldn't the highlighter be able
to work just like with a
On Dec 27, 2005, at 1:45 PM, Dmitry Goldenberg wrote:
I tried using Porter stemming in our application and it worked
great except it broke the proximity searches. Is there any way at
all that these two pieces of functionality could coexist peacefully?
I do not see any reason why they shoul
Hello,
I tried using Porter stemming in our application and it worked great except it
broke the proximity searches. Is there any way at all that these two pieces of
functionality could coexist peacefully?
I do not see any reason why they should not. It seems to me that proximity
query term
Hello,
Trying to get my field searches to work with special characters. It appears
that Lucene is not able to interpret these searches correctly (but works as
expected with generic content searches).
For instance, I created a document named item+with+pluses (plus being the
special character
Hi,
I had the same problem at the beginning.
Try
java -classpath lucene-1.4-final.jar; lucene-demos-1.4-final.jar;
org.apache.lucene.demo.IndexHTML -create -index webindex docs
If this fails go in the org/apache/lucene/demo directory and compile
IndexHTML.java with the command
javac -classp
Are you running the Sun JVM? Or some other JVM?
Erik
On Dec 27, 2005, at 10:25 AM, Federico Carbonetti wrote:
hello erik and hello everybody!
2005/12/27, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Dec 26, 2005, at 6:31 PM, Federico Carbonetti wrote:
I'm new in the ML and in the Lucene
On Dec 27, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Murali wrote:
On 12/27/05, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is no officially released 1.9 version yet. Many people are
using the current 1.9 branch for production, however, and it is
stable
(moreso than 1.4.3 IMO).
Why hasn't there been a relea
On 12/27/05, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is no officially released 1.9 version yet. Many people are
> using the current 1.9 branch for production, however, and it is stable
> (moreso than 1.4.3 IMO).
Why hasn't there been a release since 1.4.3(11/29/04)? Is there a date set
There is no officially released 1.9 version yet. Many people are
using the current 1.9 branch for production, however, and it is stable
(moreso than 1.4.3 IMO).
You have to check the latest source out from subversion and build it.
mkdir lucene
svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene
hello erik and hello everybody!
2005/12/27, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Dec 26, 2005, at 6:31 PM, Federico Carbonetti wrote:
> > I'm new in the ML and in the Lucene world in general... :)
>
> ML?
>
Mailing List! ehehe! :)
this morning i changed some settings for the PATH variabile,
I didn't find a mention about 1.9 version in Lucene site
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 4:52 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: More than 32 required/prohibited clauses in query
That's a Lucene 1.4 limitation,
How can I get latest 1.9 development version ?
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 4:52 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: More than 32 required/prohibited clauses in query
That's a Lucene 1.4 limitation, gone in t
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 4:52 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: More than 32 required/prohibited clauses in query
That's a Lucene 1.4 limitation, gone in the latest 1.9 development
version.
If yo
That's a Lucene 1.4 limitation, gone in the latest 1.9 development version.
If you want to stick with 1.4, try restructuring your query to avoid
this restriction.
-Yonik
On 12/27/05, Alex Kiselevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got a strange exception "More than 32 required/prohibited clauses i
That shouldn't happen.
What platform(s) have you seen this on, and with what Lucene versions?
-Yonik
On 12/27/05, Chris Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is generally true, most of the time.
> But my experience is, there can be some FileNotFoundException, if your
> searcher is opened for a whi
Hi,
I got a strange exception "More than 32 required/prohibited clauses in
query" in using Boolean Query
Is there any way to avoid it ?
Thanks in advance
Alexander Kiselevski
The information contained in this message is proprietary of Amdocs,
protected from disclosure, and may be
On 12/27/05, K.A.Hussain Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI all.
>
> I am a newbie to Lucene..
> Could we do indexing and deleting a document on the same file simultaneously ?
At any one time, there can only be a single Lucene index writer and
any number of index readers. You cannot have two diff
On 12/27/05, Koji Sekiguchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> > You stole my thunder! :-) Was going to post the URL after doing the
> > actual talk, but that's all right. I will post a few changes I have
> > made on the plane tonight or tomorrow to the website below.
> >
> > Let me know
On Dec 27, 2005, at 3:27 AM, M å n i s h wrote:
Suppose I search “lucene user forum” it should give correct continuous
occurrence of full text ,
But if I search for “when they occur” lucene is searching for “when
occur”
also.
I think lucene is treating “they” as stopword and removing it
This is generally true, most of the time.
But my experience is, there can be some FileNotFoundException, if your
searcher is opened for a while, and indexing is doing some file
deleting/renaming when merging.
Of course, if your data volumn is not that large and updating is not
often, maybe you won
Hi,
Basically you can update/delete and read an index simultaneously.
When you start to read the index and then update/delete the index, the
current read process will continue reading with the old data before the
delete took place. A little bit like a transaction on the database.
You don't have
HI all.
I am a newbie to Lucene..
Could we do indexing and deleting a document on the same file simultaneously ?
Do lucene provide such options to carry out the tasks?
Any Help is greatly appreciated
Thanks in advacne
regards
-Hussain.
Hi erik and other gurus,
I have some doubts over double quote queries (as it is)
Suppose I search lucene user forum it should give correct continuous
occurrence of full text ,
But if I search for when they occur lucene is searching for when occur
also.
I think lucene is treating
35 matches
Mail list logo
