Hi,
I am going to use mysql db to store some data, use
lucene(java) to index these data, and use Hibernate to
map them. I was originally thinking of using PHP to
input the data the visitors enter into the mysql db.
But if I use PHP and use mysql statement directly, it
may defeat the part of the pur
: Does it possible to retrive the data order/sort by they were inserted in the
: index but without putting any extra column in the document?
The first step anyone should take in understanding Lucene, is to start by
spending a lot of time reading over the javadocs. If you look at the Sort
class,
Thanks for your reply.
Yes, the problem is not with the QueryParser, I build the query with
code. Of course the analyzer is involved in building the query, but I
didn't mention it in the code for simplicity.
I saw the MultiPhraseQuery. Its name in my version is
PhrasePrefixQuery. Why don't we use t
Hi Hoss and All,
I am happy with your suggestion.
Does it possible to retrive the data order/sort by they were inserted in the
index but without putting any extra column in the document?
Regards,
Manoj
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, Nov
On 4 Nov 2005, at 18:32, Sean O'Connor wrote:
I'm posting this primarily hoping to give back a tiny bit to a very
helpful community. More likely however, someone else will open my
eyes to an easier approach than what I outline below...
I've come up with a very ugly conversion approach from
I'm posting this primarily hoping to give back a tiny bit to a very
helpful community. More likely however, someone else will open my eyes
to an easier approach than what I outline below...
I've come up with a very ugly conversion approach from regular Query
objects into SpanQuery objects. I t
I must admit, I have not tried running your test, but based on reading it,
I think you are missunderstanding what's happening here. (or perhaps I
am.)
You initialy stated that you were having a problem because your Analyzer
outputs multiple tokens at the same position, and your phrase queries we
This is a source code that shows the problem I am talking about.
In this example a new analyzer is made that outputs all words to the
same position (all but the first one are positionIncrement=0).
To get the problem I am talking about uncomment the only commented line.
//---
On 4 Nov 2005, at 13:45, Daniel Naber wrote:
On Freitag 04 November 2005 11:33, Erik Hatcher wrote:
This should have been fixed one year ago with Daniel and myself.
Really? It works in this OR kind of fashion with tokens in 0-
incremented positions?
Yes, this test case shows it (multi
The formula should also be in the javadoc for Similarity class, if it
was there in 1.2.
Otis
--- Karl Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> the scoring formula for Lucene is well explained in "Lucene in
> Action".
> However, is this formula also valid for Lucene 1.2 (which I am
>
Hello group,
the scoring formula for Lucene is well explained in "Lucene in Action".
However, is this formula also valid for Lucene 1.2 (which I am using). I
need to know that for documentation purposes. If not, where can I find the
currect formula since I do not want to interpret if from the code
On Freitag 04 November 2005 11:33, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> > This should have been fixed one year ago with Daniel and myself.
>
> Really? It works in this OR kind of fashion with tokens in 0-
> incremented positions?
Yes, this test case shows it (multi will be turned into multi and multi2,
both a
: > Lucene searching system. How do you manages the iterator and what
: > is the
: > method callback at query execution time(a broader view).
:
: There really isn't any method callback, at least not in the way I'm
: thinking of it. When you search you get back Hits. Hits is an
If you want a lo
Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01/RiA poster child community webapp. This new
version ads broadcast video, social networking such as favorite authors and
html editor.
It likely already has groups and content you are already using but aggregated
and safer, including technology, Java, etc., but it o
On 4 Nov 2005, at 03:53, Pierrick Brihaye wrote:
Hi Ahmed and all,
Ahmed El-dawy wrote:
Hello,
My analyzer sometimes gives multiple terms for the same word. This
makes them generated at the same position. When I use PhraseQuery to
search for this term, it matches documents with all these
On 4 Nov 2005, at 02:50, Manoj Kr. Sheoran wrote:
- state of the index (optimized vs. unoptimized)
Which one will be best for these sort of scenario? Optimized?
Optimized is always best for better search efficiency.
But practically speaking, how optimized an index is depends on how
you ne
On 4 Nov 2005, at 05:23, Manoj Kr. Sheoran wrote:
Hi Erik and all,
Thanks for the concern. We will test and let you know it also. We
would
really appreciate if any of you can tell some more about the
architecture of
Lucene searching system. How do you manages the iterator and what
is the
Hi Erik and all,
Thanks for the concern. We will test and let you know it also. We would
really appreciate if any of you can tell some more about the architecture of
Lucene searching system. How do you manages the iterator and what is the
method callback at query execution time(a broader view).
R
I certainly recommend testing this to see what kind of response times
you get for the first and successive searches after the caches are
built - be sure to use the same IndexReader for all searches to
benefit from caching :)
Sorting on 4-5 columns seems kind of extreme. Sorting uses up RAM
Hi Ahmed and all,
Ahmed El-dawy wrote:
Hello,
My analyzer sometimes gives multiple terms for the same word. This
makes them generated at the same position. When I use PhraseQuery to
search for this term, it matches documents with all these terms at the
same position (as if it is an AND). I wa
Hello,
My analyzer sometimes gives multiple terms for the same word. This
makes them generated at the same position. When I use PhraseQuery to
search for this term, it matches documents with all these terms at the
same position (as if it is an AND). I want it to match documents with
at least ONE
21 matches
Mail list logo
