Thanks for the advice..the book looks good..hopefully it will be of help.
Anushri
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anushri,
Save yourself some time by using the code from Lucene in Action -
http://lucenebook.com/ . The code is free, and people say the book is
not bad...
Otis
--- an
Can you make a search that searches deleted docs as well as normal docs?
___
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo!
Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
---
On Thursday 20 October 2005 00:40, Sean O'Connor wrote:
> Hello,
> I have user entered search commands which I want to convert to
> SpanQueries. I have seen in the book "Lucene in Action" that no parser
> existed at time of publication, but there was someone working on a
> SpanQuery parser.
Hello,
I have user entered search commands which I want to convert to
SpanQueries. I have seen in the book "Lucene in Action" that no parser
existed at time of publication, but there was someone working on a
SpanQuery parser. Can anyone point me to that code, or provide any
suggestions?
Anushri,
Save yourself some time by using the code from Lucene in Action -
http://lucenebook.com/ . The code is free, and people say the book is
not bad...
Otis
--- anushri kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to lucene. I am working on an application that searches HTML,
> pdf,
Hi,
I'm new to lucene. I am working on an application that searches HTML, pdf, txt
and word documents. I wanted to know how to overwrite the indexes for a
document which has been modified. Should I overwrite that file, delete all the
existing indexes and reindex all the files in the dirctory
Thanks, Chris.
Chris Hostetter wrote:
1.4.3 is in fact the last "official" release.
docs that refer to 2.0 or 1.9 are refering the the proposed next release.
When they refer to bugs fixes or features added in 2.0 or in 1.9 they are
refering to the code currently available in the trunk of subve
Thanks Chris
I haven't tried it yet, but I think I understand your idea now (after 24
hours, man I'm slow on the uptake;)
I'll try it today.
-Sid
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 5:05 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sub
1.4.3 is in fact the last "official" release.
docs that refer to 2.0 or 1.9 are refering the the proposed next release.
When they refer to bugs fixes or features added in 2.0 or in 1.9 they are
refering to the code currently available in the trunk of subversion.
An explanation of the distinction
Hello,
I'm looking into integrating lucene with derby. I'm just starting out so
I'm afraid I'm going to pepper this list with some newbie questions.
Here's one: The downloadable lucene distribution has rev level 1.4.3 and
was released a year ago according to
http://lucene.apache.org/java/doc
thanks Daniel, did not see that.
On 10/18/05, Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dienstag 18 Oktober 2005 10:52, javier muguruza wrote:
>
> > I was using System.setProperty("org.apache.lucene.lockdir", ...) in
> > 1.4.2 successfully. Now I updated to a 1.9rc-1 and this seems to have
> >
Okay I'll do that. Thanks very much for the advice as it's much appreciated.
Malcolm Clark
I would suggest isolating Digester from Lucene and running a unit test
on just the Digester part to ensure you are getting the right things
back from Digester. Once you are sure your digester setup is correct,
then look at how it feeds into Lucene and post back here if it still
doesn't work
Hi
I used Luke to check the content of the index and they are not there.
cheers,
MC
Hi,
About your first question:
How do you know that only the last "Chapter" element is stored? could it be
that you are only getting the last one? Try using getValues() instead of
get.
Oren
On 10/16/05, Malcolm Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I'm using Lucene/Digester etc for my MS
15 matches
Mail list logo
