Hi,
Is 'Analyzing' same as 'Tokenizing'?
When we say the Keyword field is not analyzed, but indexed and stored, does
it indicate it is not tokenized as well? That means inorder to find a query
match against a keyword there has to be an exact match(case sensitive).
--
- Andy
Hi,
You need to do a little bit of research :) Please search the mailing
list archives (links to them are on Lucene site). Searcj for
JDBCDirectory. Use Google and search for +JDBCDirectory +Vito (this is
the name of its author).
Otis
--- Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well, it seems I
well, it seems I want to store the index into the database itself. ANy ideas
for that? Even if thats possible?
On 9/26/05, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Lucene indices are created in the file system (FSDirectory) or in
> memory (RAMDirectory). If you want to store them elsewhere
Lucene indices are created in the file system (FSDirectory) or in
memory (RAMDirectory). If you want to store them elsewhere, you need
to implement your own Directory.
Otis
--- Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Otis:
>
> Thanks for the good and clean explanation! I will first try this out,
Otis:
Thanks for the good and clean explanation! I will first try this out, and
let you know how that goes...what you are saying is making VERY good sense!
Once I index them, will this goto the filesystem, or somewhere else? I want
this index to be created in the table, so I can do quick SELECTs t
It's easy, pull the data from DB using something like JDBC, and from
retrieved rows create Lucene Documents. Of course, it gets more
complicated than this, but start with something simple like using JDBC
to run SELECTs, converting results to Lucene Documents, and index them
with IndexWriter.
Ther
I *believe* that because of the ConjunctionScorer in 1.9, BooleanQueries
consisting of all required terms are now optimized for situations like
this, the Scorer for the common clause won't be asked to score things that
the un-common clause has allready given a score of 0.0.
: Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2
Otis:
How do you do that? Got a quick and simple example? We have been looking for
an example for the last 3-4 months, but no luck
On 9/25/05, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to do that in a database instead of a flat text file?
>
> Huh?
> You mean is it po
Hi!
I learnt from a mailing list archive that the following applies:
-
Tue, 06 Jan 2004
[...]
I have a index with documents that have only 2 fields, the first
(unique) is 'very unique', in that most document have at least somewhat
varying terms, the second is a
Maik:
Thanks for the reply. I was going to go that way, but it involves a lot of
work, since my text file is about 3 meg of information.
However, I am looking into integrating my data with Derby plus Lucene.
TIA!
On 9/26/05, Maik Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Can I use lucene to
On Sep 26, 2005, at 2:30 PM, tirupathi reddy wrote:
Hello,
SO now How can I index the text files in Lucene?
Didn't we go over this before?! :)
Follow these steps _exactly_:
1) Download the source code from Lucene in Action from http://
www.lucenebook.com (you'll see a link at the top o
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For indexing text that has multiple languages I don't know what to
> recommend. Well, I do - try the StandardAnalyzer and see if that
> produces satisfactory results, but you'd really need a smart analyzer
> that knows how to properly tokenize an
Shashikant Kore wrote:
Search:
- Get the superset of stopwords by merging the stopwords from all the languages.
This step doesn't make sense. Stopwords ARE language specific. A
stopword in one language may be a valid content word in another language
- e.g. English stopwords "is, by, far" mea
I've never dealt with multisearcher's before, so i'm not sure what caveats
there are when doing Sorts with them, but you should be able to make your
own SortComparatorSource which knows about any special fields you have
that might go by multiple names, and when it's requested to sort on one of
tho
Hello,
SO now How can I index the text files in Lucene?
Thanx,
MTREDDY
Tirupati Reddy Manyam
24-06-08,
Sundugaullee-24,
79110 Freiburg
GERMANY.
Phone: 00497618811257
cell : 004917624649007
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail
You seem to be using the example code from LIA chapter 7, however you seem
to be confusing the "DocumentHandlerException" class mentioned there with
org.ujac.print.DocumentHandlerException -- a completely unrelated class
that just happens to have the same name (i'm guessing you found it doing a
go
This package org.ujac.print.DocumentHandlerException is not part of Lucene,
Check whether you are using some other third party class files in your
program.
-Original Message-
From: tirupathi reddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 11:20 PM
To: java-user@lucene.
Hi,
I plan to use lucene to index documents in multiple languages (ie.
each document in more than one European language) as follows.
Index:
- Before indexing find the language of the document (using Nutch's
Language Identifier)
- Use the Analyzer for that language to index the document. Analyzer
hello,
I am using the following code to index text files.
InputStream is = new FileInputStream(pdf);
DefaultStyledDocument styledDoc = new DefaultStyledDocument();
try {
new RTFEditorKit().read(is, styledDoc, 0);
bodyText = styledDoc.getText(0, styledDoc.getLe
On Sep 26, 2005, at 3:10 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
I used my bug votes already. I hope more people will do that, hint:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=12310110
Is there a way to view the open issues sorted by number of votes?
There is the "Popular Issues" view:
<
Hi,
I have a strange exception when I'm trying to recreate an IndexWriter,
that was previously defined.
I did the following steps:
1. mWriter = new IndexWriter(indexPath, analyzer, true);
2. mWriter.addDocument(document);
3. mWriter.optimize();
4. mWriter.c
Frank,
Limo I am using just to see the index properties.
And even if I search same value by my application's search component,I am
not getting the results,
I think I have to build the query using different analyzers ,
-Original Message-
From: Kunemann Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem is that in limo you can only use standard analyzers for your
queries. As you've already seen some of them will change the key value to
something else or even remove them completely.
So I don't think limo will be the right tool for you or at least you'll have to
change it for your nee
Greetings!
I have a relatively simple problem:
I want to sort a set of search results by a field, say "author".
Fine for one index, or more than one if the field "author" is the same.
However, say I want to use a multisearcher (2+ indices), but the second
index uses field name "writer".
If I set
Hi All
I have indexed and displayed highlighted search results. [following lucene in
action examples: Thanks authors]. Now I want to display the content of the file
with highlighted terms.
An idea I could comeup with is , clicking on search result I can open stream to
a document, search the
Try using a PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper through wich you can specify analyzers
on a per field basis. This way you could skip analyzing this particular
field while searching.
On 9/26/05, M å n i s h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Actually in Index I can see that MN12345 value very clearly that too in
Actually in Index I can see that MN12345 value very clearly that too in the
same case ( I have Limo Lucene Index Monitor) but when I am trying to search
the same value , I am not getting any results, I think the problem lies some
where else..
-Original Message-
From: Kunemann Frank
It should be possible to combine queries using different types of analyzers.
The only problem I can see is if you're using one single line for the whole
query.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: "M å n i s h " [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 9:05 AM
To: java-user
Otis,
On Monday 26 September 2005 00:37, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> As Erik Hatcher noted in another email (it might have been on the -dev
> list), we'll go through JIRA before making the next release and try to
> push the patches like this one into the core. Personally, it has been
I used my bug
I thought of not using any Analyzer, but the problem is I got other queries
that I am appending to this value with either OR or AND, so for that part of
query I need Standard Analyzer ,
I think I should index that value like normal text, then may be it will
work.
-Original Message-
From
30 matches
Mail list logo
