Re: Can any one help

On Thursday 22 September 2005 15:20, santosh wrote: (TooManyClauses) > We are passing this String " booleanQuery.toString() =   >  +contents:java* +contents:oracle* "  to searcher see http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ#head-06fafb5d19e786a50fb3dfb8821a6af9f37aa831 -- http://www.dan

Re: Lucene trunk update question. WAS RE: search performance enhancement

On Thursday 22 September 2005 11:45, Peter Gelderbloem wrote: > I noticed you posted links to bits of code below. > How and when will these be made part of the svn trunk? > It seems universally useful and I think should be the default behaviour. The code has the same licence as the trunk, so you c

working towards a release...

Cross-posting... In gearing up for a 1.9 release, I've been perusing our issue tracker (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE) to see what low-hanging fruit there is that I can help address. This message is a prod for others to do the same. We have >100 open issues, some of which ma

Re: Splitting of words

On Sep 22, 2005, at 4:36 AM, Endre Stølsvik wrote: | The StandardTokenizer is the most sophisticated one built into Lucene. You | can see the types of tokens it emits by looking at the javadoc here: |

Lucene trunk update question. WAS RE: search performance enhancement

I noticed you posted links to bits of code below. How and when will these be made part of the svn trunk? It seems universally useful and I think should be the default behaviour. Peter Gelderbloem -Original Message- From: Paul Elschot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 September 2005 19:1

Re: Splitting of words

| The StandardTokenizer is the most sophisticated one built into Lucene. You | can see the types of tokens it emits by looking at the javadoc here: | | | It recognizes e-mail addresses, interi