Thank you for your response.
That was my original goal.
On 9/21/05, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> : Since I used the StandAnalyzer when I originally created the index,
> : I therefore use the StandardTokenizer to tokenize the input stream.
> : Is there a better way to do what I
I'm looking for some suggestions on an analyzer decision. I've got my own
thoughts to this already, but would like some initial feedback on it first.
The scenario:
- An index of geographic information: cities, towns, states,
neighborhoods, zipcodes, generic names, etc. Examples are "New Yor
: Since I used the StandAnalyzer when I originally created the index,
: I therefore use the StandardTokenizer to tokenize the input stream.
: Is there a better way to do what I try to do ?
: From your comment below, it appears that I should just use next() instead
if your goal is to recreate
Thank you for the response.
I was trying to do something really simple - I want to extract the context
for
terms and phrases from files that satisfy some (many) queries.
I *know* that file test.txt is a hit (because I queried the index, and
it tells me that test.txt satisfies the query). Then, I o
That's exactly why I don't feel mine is the best
solution. Many people have been asking about the right
pattern for Lucene in webapps, and I'm paying close
attention to those.
To open an IndexSearcher is easy; the hard part for me
is when to close it (to be ready for a potentially new
index.) Perh
James,
Well, if you want to do things right, then you should probably also get
that IndexSearcher (or any other Java code) out of your JSP. :)
You are right, IndexSearchers are meant to be reused. When the index
changes, you need to open a new one, if you want to see the changes.
Otis
--- Jame
That demo (results.jsp) opens a IndexSearcher per each
request, which I deem not really the right way of
using Lucene in a web app.
I used jspInit() to initiate a servlet-wide instance:
<%!
IndexSearcher searcher = null;
public void jspInit() {
searcher = ...;
}
%>
Still not comp
Hello,
Are you sure that both processes use the same directory to store the Lock files?
Well, the variable FSDirectory.LOCK_DIR shows for both applications the
same value (the temp directory in my home directory C:\Documents and
Settings\Matthew\...).
If both processes are on the same ma
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 03:29, John Wang wrote:
> Hi Paul and other gurus:
>
> In a related topic, seems lucene is scoring documents that would hit in a
> "prohibited" boolean clause, e.g. NOT field:value. It doesn't seem to make
> sense to score a document that is to be excluded from the
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 19:21, Patricio Galeas wrote:
> I search for a JSP examples of a simple search application with Lucene.
lucene-1.4.3.tar.gz contains src/jsp. Also try "ant war-demo" in Lucene's
source package.
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
---
Could you elaborate on what you're trying to do, please?
Using StandardTokenizer in this low-level fashion is practically
unheard of, so I think knowing what you're attempting to do will help
us help you :)
Erik
On Sep 21, 2005, at 12:17 PM, Beady Geraghty wrote:
I see some definiti
Hello,
You could extract the file name extension at index time, and index it
as a Field.Keyword. Then you can search for it with a simple TermQuery
or : syntax using QueryParser.
Otis
P.S.
Please don't cross-post - use [EMAIL PROTECTED] list
--- haipeng du <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how cou
Hello,
I search for a JSP examples of a simple search application with Lucene.
I try to execute the lucene search as a .jsp file but it doesn't work.
Do you know where can I found information about this topic
Thank You
-
To uns
I see some definitions in StandardTokenizerConstants.java
Perhaps these are the values for t.kind.
Perhaps, I was confused between between the usage of
getNextToken() and next() in the standard analyzer.
When should one use getNextToken() instead of next()
I am just starting to use Lucene, so ple
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/Sort.htm
l
-Original Message-
From: Wi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:20 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to sort results
I want to sort results by some field.
Of cause i ca
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.html#search(org.apache.lucene.search.Query,%20org.apache.lucene.search.Sort)
http://www.lucenebook.com/search?query=sort
--
Ian.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21/09/05, Wi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to sort results by some
I want to sort results by some field.
Of cause i can fetch all results and then sort them in memory
but this is bad way...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could someone tell me how to use the StandardTokenizer properly ?
I thought that if the tokenizer.getNextToken() returns null, then it is
the end of stream. I have a loop that tries to get the next token until
it is null. But the loop doesn't terminate.
I tried to termintae the loop by t.kind == 0
You don't get the boost back directly... it's folded into the "norm" for the
field and does affect the score when you search against the index.
-Yonik
On 9/21/05, Steve Gaunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was hoping someone could shed some light on this?
> When I set a boost for a
Hi all,
I was hoping someone could shed some light on this?
When I set a boost for a particular field during indexing, for example
field.setBoost(1.5f);
document.add(field);
Then do a indexwriter.optimize();
But when I do a search and get the document back, the boost value for
that field has b
Hi all,
I've been searching through the list archives for this info but haven't
found exactly what I'm looking for... Hoping that someone might have the
answer to this off the top of their head.
Is the amount of memory taken up by an IndexSearcher object proportional
to the size of the index? I've
Hi,
There is an issue with file locking and NFS, which requirs setting some
system property for lock files directory that must be local. Might be
relevant.
Oren
On 9/21/05, John Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How do you "update" the index?
>
> -John
>
> On 9/12/05, Harini Raghavan <[EMAIL P
Are you sure that both processes use the same directory to store the Lock files?
If both processes are on the same machine, they will both default to the same
local directory and you won't see the problem.
If they are on separate machines, you should set the lock directory to some
shared locati
23 matches
Mail list logo
