I use a custom collector:
class ResultCollector extends HitCollector
{
SortedSet set = new TreeSet();
IndexSearcher searcher;
Location me;
ResultCollector(IndexSearcher searcher, Location me)
{
this.me = me;
this.searcher = searcher;
}
public void collect(int id, float scor
On Sep 17, 2005, at 4:10 PM, James Huang wrote:
Hi,
I can sort the search results by distance now. But,
the relevance is lost.
I like to have the results sorted by relevance +
distance, i.e., relevance first; for results of
similar relevance, order by distance. How to do that?
How are you c
I guess I can use HitCollector and implement my own
sorting, right?
Is there a better approach?
--- James Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can sort the search results by distance now. But,
> the relevance is lost.
>
> I like to have the results sorted by relevance +
> distance, i.e
Hi,
I can sort the search results by distance now. But,
the relevance is lost.
I like to have the results sorted by relevance +
distance, i.e., relevance first; for results of
similar relevance, order by distance. How to do that?
Thanks a lot in advance!
-James
--- James Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTE
>>Basically your lucene_query function will return a true/false in one
of the query predicates for each record.
Almost, it returns a score - much more useful than just a boolean and
the key difference between a search engine and a database (partial
matching with relevance ranked scores). Thes
Ben -
I can think of two ways to achieve this.
1) While adding your information to the index, query the index for an
existing record. If you get no match, add the record.
2) Control the exclusivity requirement from your data source, so that no
duplicate records ever have the opportunity to be i
Mark:
VERY VERY good post! Please publish this doc and example.
On 9/17/05, Chris Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/17/05, markharw00d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mag Gam wrote:
> >
> > >Does your example store the index in the derby db or somewhere else? I
> was
> > >thinking of index
On 9/17/05, markharw00d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mag Gam wrote:
>
> >Does your example store the index in the derby db or somewhere else? I was
> >thinking of indexing a table in a seperate column.
> >
> >
> The software is not an org.apache.lucene.store.Directory implementation
> ie an FSDire
Mag Gam wrote:
Does your example store the index in the derby db or somewhere else? I was
thinking of indexing a table in a seperate column.
The software is not an org.apache.lucene.store.Directory implementation
ie an FSDirectory alternative for persisting Lucene data in a relational
table
Does your example store the index in the derby db or somewhere else? I was
thinking of indexing a table in a seperate column.
On 9/16/05, markharw00d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know there have been some posts discussing how to integrate Lucene
> with Derby recently.
>
> I've added an ex
Mark:
Thanks for looking at this.I will try it out!
On 9/16/05, markharw00d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know there have been some posts discussing how to integrate Lucene
> with Derby recently.
>
> I've added an example project that works with both HSQLDB and Derby
> here: http://issues.a
I wrote:
(is svn.apache.org down? I can't seem to connect to the repository
server to get the latest source.)
It is up now...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Is there a Query that will allow wildcards in the field name?
For example, lets say I have documents with the following fields:
Field Name = Field Value
- Doc 1
/faq/question/a = foo
- Doc 2
/article/section/p/a = foo
Is there a way to build a query like:
QueryParser.parse(
"foo",
Hi,
I am storing names in my index, and am currently getting duplicates
back (quite correctly, on Lucene's part), because I am storing:
id name
1 fred
2 fred
What I want to happen is, if a duplicate name is added to the index, I
only ever want one entity to exist with the name
Daniel Naber wrote:
On Friday 16 September 2005 21:51, Matthias Bräuer wrote:
but
unstored field and the passed in Reader happens to be a StringReader
(e.g. when extracting Word documents using the Textmining library) the
field is not indexed at all. That means Luke shows no terms for this
fie
15 matches
Mail list logo
