On Jun 25, 2005, at 5:13 PM, John Fereira wrote:
At 02:42 PM 6/25/2005 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote:
On Saturday 25 June 2005 13:59, John Fereira wrote:
> Was there someplace that I should have looked to determine that
> qp.parse(String) would call the non-static method but qp.parse
(String,
: The simple question - I have a document and I add it into index with
: TermVector support.
: How can I simply retrive the TermVector information for the document?
:
: TermFreqVector vector = reader.getTermFreqVector(document)?
: reader.delete(document);
: Etc..
Open an IndexReader,
: Is this the best way to do this? Is there a way to store location
: information associated with each term within a field? Note that there can
: be thousands of documents containing thousands of pages.
It depends on what's important to you.
(FYI: i'm document with "file" in the rest of this m
At 02:42 PM 6/25/2005 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote:
On Saturday 25 June 2005 13:59, John Fereira wrote:
> Was there someplace that I should have looked to determine that
> qp.parse(String) would call the non-static method but qp.parse(String,
> String, Analyzer) would not?
Your IDE should have war
Hi,
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For a domain-centric identifier, use a custom field to store
> (and index perhaps?) it. Lucene's Document id's are internal
> and not controllable.
Unfortunately Lucene contains API that strongly attached to internal id :(
For example -
I have been browsing the archives concerning this particular topic.
I'm in the same boat and the customer has clustering requirements.
To give some background:
I have a constant flow of incoming messages flying over the network that
need to be archived in db, indexed and dispatched to thousand
On Jun 25, 2005, at 7:59 AM, John Fereira wrote:
Aha! Look at the method signature of your parse() call. That is the
culprit. To call the non-static method so that you use the
*instance* of QueryParser rather than the default settings, change to
this:
query = qp.parse(searchterms);
Th
As long as you use the same Searcher object, you shouldn't see document
ids changing.
When you open a searcher you get a consistent view of the segments that
existed at the time. Merging creates new segments which you won't see
until you create a new searcher.
In short, retrieving hits whi
On Saturday 25 June 2005 13:59, John Fereira wrote:
> Was there someplace that I should have looked to determine that
> qp.parse(String) would call the non-static method but qp.parse(String,
> String, Analyzer) would not?
Your IDE should have warned you about that. If it didn't, try Eclipse.
Reg
At 03:42 PM 6/24/2005 -0400, you wrote:
On Jun 24, 2005, at 2:54 PM, John Fereira wrote:
Last month there was a brief thread about changing the implicit
conjuction for search terms from an OR to AND with a response that
the API provides a setOperator method for doing so.
A site I am developi
On Saturday 25 June 2005 02:10, Lokesh Bajaj wrote:
> 3] Does this seem like a JVM issue? Since its always pointing to a
> native method, I am not really sure what to look for or debug.
Does you JVM have enough heap (e.g. -Xmx500M)? Java gets slow if it's busy
with garbage collection.
Regards
On Saturday 25 June 2005 04:26, jian chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think Span query in general should do more work than simple Phrase
> query. Phrase query, in its simplest form, should just try to find all
> terms that are adjacent to each other. Meanwhile, Span query does not
> necessary be adjacent t
12 matches
Mail list logo
