: I do the following in Luke's Program:
I have to confess, i've never acctually gotten arround to using Luke, but
if i understand what you're saying, and if Luke is doing what i think it
is, then i believe your problem is an Analyzer issue...
: b) Enter term field-name: unit and value="DOSE", hit
Peter, see this:
http://www.tropo.com/techno/java/lucene/imap.html
http://guests.evectors.it/zoe/
Otis
--- Peter Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Has anyone got an example of how to index emails from Microsoft
> Exchange using Lucene?
>
> TIA
>
> William
>
>
>
Urs Eichmann wrote:
My index consists of about 26 different fields. I have a very weird problem:
On certain fields, I cannot search - i.e. the search always returns 0
documents. I used Luke's Lucene Index Toolbox, and the behaviour there is
weird as well:
I do the following in Luke's Program:
Please send us a (short and sweet) example that demonstrates this
issue - preferably using RAMDirectory in a way that is easily
runnable by someone else.
Thanks,
Erik
On Jun 22, 2005, at 3:36 PM, JM Tinghir wrote:
Hi,
Actually I have the same problem. Queries are working on a few fie
Hi,
Actually I have the same problem. Queries are working on a few fields
but not all of them, although the index is ok (checked it with luke).
But I have no idea to solve that...
Jean-Marie Tinghir
2005/6/22, Urs Eichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My index consists of about 26 fields. I have a
My index consists of about 26 different fields. I have a very weird problem:
On certain fields, I cannot search - i.e. the search always returns 0
documents. I used Luke's Lucene Index Toolbox, and the behaviour there is
weird as well:
I do the following in Luke's Program:
a) go to the Document
On Jun 22, 2005, at 2:02 PM, George Abraham wrote:
Erik,
That worked like a charm. It seems to me that reading up on the
different analyzers would solve a lot of questions in my mind.
It would solve a lot of folks questions! I find the analysis part of
Lucene fascinating. The really inter
Erik,
That worked like a charm. It seems to me that reading up on the
different analyzers would solve a lot of questions in my mind.
Unfortunately your book has not arrived yet from Amazon. Aarrgh!
Thanks a ton!
George
> Your analyzer is eating the ImageExistsBit:1 because "1" returns no
> tokens
On Jun 22, 2005, at 1:24 PM, George Abraham wrote:
Otis,
I think MultiFieldQueryParser (if I am not mistaken) uses the same
query string to search multiple fields. Let me know if it is
otherwise.
Erik,
Let me see if I can answer those questions. Here are some code
snippets, by the way.
FOR INDE
Not sure if this is the appropriate forum to ask this.
We are currently looking for an implementation of a Lucene
Analyzer for the Thai language.
We are looking to pay a developer/consultant for a Thai Analyzer
implementation.
Note that ICU has support for Thai word breaking, and is available
Otis,
I think MultiFieldQueryParser (if I am not mistaken) uses the same
query string to search multiple fields. Let me know if it is
otherwise.
Erik,
Let me see if I can answer those questions. Here are some code
snippets, by the way.
FOR INDEX
IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(indexDir, new
My index consists of about 26 fields. I have a very wierd problem: On
certain fields, I cannot search - i.e. the search always returns 0
documents. I used Luke's Lucene Index Toolbox, and the behaviour there is
weird as well:
I do the following in Luke's Program:
a) go to the Documents Tab
b) E
Hi all
Has anyone got an example of how to index emails from Microsoft Exchange using
Lucene?
TIA
William
-
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with
Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos
George,
You can use MultiFieldQueryParser instead of QueryParser.
Otis
--- George Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
> Forgive me for the basic question. When you are querying multiple
> fields using QueryParser, what is the exact code?
>
> I tried QueryParser.parse(queryString, "Searc
Markus Atteneder writes:
There is a possibility for searching with the "*" and "?" wildcard at the
end and in the middle of a search string, but not at the beginning, is there
way to do this?
Sure. Simply index reversed words.
The reason why QP prohibits wildcards at the beginning is perfor
Is there a straightforward way that I could change the scoring algorithm
such that it would break ties based on looking at the value of a field?
I'm not actually searching for the value in the field, so its not part
of the query - I just want documents that have a particular field set to
a par
On Jun 22, 2005, at 11:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! Using StopAnalyzer helped solving the problem. Is there any
detail
documentation of what each of this analyzers do?
Here are some pointers:
- Lucene's javadocs give a brief description, such as lucene.apache.org/java/docs/ap
On Jun 22, 2005, at 10:49 AM, George Abraham wrote:
All,
Forgive me for the basic question. When you are querying multiple
fields using QueryParser, what is the exact code?
I tried QueryParser.parse(queryString, "SearchTerms", analyzer) where
queryString was "SearchTerms:visnu temple ImageExis
Giovanni Dima wrote:
Andrzej, tanks for the reply. I'm sorry but i've another (similar)
question... Lucene and nutch use the same parser and analyzer?
No, they don't.
I seems to understand that the segments created from the nutch are
different from those creating from lucene. I've installed
>
> On Jun 21, 2005, at 2:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I found a discrepancy in results for an identical search
>> ("processing")
>> done with lucene and mysql. Seems like lucene is not returning results
>> where the search word is associated with "-"(hyphen) or
>> '."(period). For
>> examp
All,
Forgive me for the basic question. When you are querying multiple
fields using QueryParser, what is the exact code?
I tried QueryParser.parse(queryString, "SearchTerms", analyzer) where
queryString was "SearchTerms:visnu temple ImageExistsBit:1",
SearchTerms and ImageExistsBit being the two f
Andrzej, tanks for the reply.
I'm sorry but i've another (similar) question...
Lucene and nutch use the same parser and analyzer? I seems to understand that
the segments created from the nutch are different from those creating from
lucene.
I've installed nutch and I've created folders db and seg
On Jun 22, 2005, at 4:01 AM, Morus Walter wrote:
Markus Atteneder writes:
There is a possibility for searching with the "*" and "?" wildcard
at the
end and in the middle of a search string, but not at the
beginning, is there
way to do this?
Sure. Simply index reversed words.
The reaso
> >
> Sure. Simply index reversed words.
>
Since I do not have much experience with lucene can you explain it more
exactly for me? THX!
--
Weitersagen: GMX DSL-Flatrates mit Tempo-Garantie!
Ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
---
Never mind, disregard the original request.
Erik, dude, do you not sleep?
Anyway I figured it out. As for the demo...hehe, you
guys were right, I basically started from scratch
yesterday.
Thanks all.
I'm sure I'll have more questions later, but for now,
I'm on a roll!!
:-)
B
--- Erik Hatcher
Giovanni Dima wrote:
Hi!
We're trying to use nutch as web-spider and lucene as indexer and searcher.
Nutch and Lucene work good separately, but we do not succeed to link lucene to
the index created by nutch.
We've modified the file "configuring.jsp" specifying in the "indexLocation"
the index
On Jun 22, 2005, at 8:13 AM, Brian wrote:
All,
I've been able to create an index across the
network. However when I do my search, the link I'm
trying to generate show's null. What it actually
points to is http://localhost/mywebapp
Where should I be looking in order to have my link
generated
All,
I've been able to create an index across the
network. However when I do my search, the link I'm
trying to generate show's null. What it actually
points to is http://localhost/mywebapp
Where should I be looking in order to have my link
generated correctly.
Thanks in advance.
Brian
_
Hi!
We're trying to use nutch as web-spider and lucene as indexer and searcher.
Nutch and Lucene work good separately, but we do not succeed to link lucene to
the index created by nutch.
We've modified the file "configuring.jsp" specifying in the "indexLocation"
the index file created by Nutch,
Ciau,
Ce mai faci?
Cred ca te-am mai intrebat ce lucrezi, dar am uitat.
In viitorul apropiat s-ar putea sa lucrez si eu putin in directia text
mining
si bineinteles ca am sa refolosesc ce e implementat in lucene.
S-ar putea ca munca noastra sa aiba ceva puncte comune .. te
intereseaza sa
ma
Markus Atteneder writes:
> There is a possibility for searching with the "*" and "?" wildcard at the
> end and in the middle of a search string, but not at the beginning, is there
> way to do this?
>
Sure. Simply index reversed words.
The reason why QP prohibits wildcards at the beginning is perf
Dear all,
I am using Lucene for indexing documents.
I would like to include phrases (of a certain maximum length given
as a parameter) in the index. I know this is non-standard for e.g.
searching, where a PhraseQuery can be built which makes use of the
terms positions. However, I am not
There is a possibility for searching with the "*" and "?" wildcard at the
end and in the middle of a search string, but not at the beginning, is there
way to do this?
--
Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail gratis + 3 Ausgaben stern gratis
++ Jetzt anmelden & testen ++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail
33 matches
Mail list logo
