On Jun 14, 2005, at 7:23 PM, Jay Hill wrote:
I have a need to limit my Hits returned based on one of the indexed
fields. This is a web application and we want to limit the number of
hits from any one host. We have a field named "host_id" and I'd like
to be able to limit my results to no more tha
I don't see a way to do this today. How many different hosts are there? If
it's small, you could execute the query that many times only grabbing the
top 3 results from each. Otherwise, you'll have to use brute force with a
HitCollector and read the field for each doc. Good luck!
Tony Schwartz
I have a need to limit my Hits returned based on one of the indexed
fields. This is a web application and we want to limit the number of
hits from any one host. We have a field named "host_id" and I'd like
to be able to limit my results to no more than three results for any
one host_id.
Any help i
Hi All,
I have overidden QueryParser's getFieldQuery() so that it returns a
SpanNearQuery instead of a PhraseQuery.
but that stopped the Highlighter working. I added the following to
QueryTermExtractor:
private static final void getTerms(Query query, HashSet terms,boolean
prohibite
On Jun 14, 2005, at 12:46 PM, Peter A. Friend wrote:
From reading the docs, it appears that Lucene supports addition of
new fields over time to an existing index. This is very handy for
folks whose indexing requirements change over time. My question has
to do with a change in an existing f
From reading the docs, it appears that Lucene supports addition of
new fields over time to an existing index. This is very handy for
folks whose indexing requirements change over time. My question has
to do with a change in an existing field name that goes from being
unstored to stored. Obv
Hi,
I did a quick google search and couldn't find any info on this...
I seem to be having a problem when I try to execute a search using a
HitCollector while the index is being indexed. Does it make sense that I
could be getting this error because the index is being merged while the
HitCollector i
java-user@lucene.apache.org schrieb am 14.06.05 08:49:11:
I'm not 100% sure I understand your question, but...
: order to compute the TF I count the occurences of terms which are
: similar to the term. But I've got problems to compute the IDF, because I
: must know the number of documents in wh
It appears you have answered your own question. The problem seems to be in
your code.
Without seeing it though, how can we help?
Tony Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"What we need is more cowbell."
> Hi,
> I'm currently using Lucene on a java web site; I've a class containing a
> synchronized meth
Hi,
I'm currently using Lucene on a java web site; I've a class containing a
synchronized method that runs all the update on the index, this class
also contains a method (not synchronized) called getSearcher which
returns an IndexSearcher object.
I'm using the singleton pattern for this class so t
Thanks for the advice,
I think this may be a solution.
In case you've experimented with this setting, could you please tell me
what are the side effects of limitting segment size?
This will probably cause searches to run slower?
Markus Wiederkehr wrote:
I am not an expert, but maybe the occas
Gusenbauer Stefan wrote:
A few weeks before I had a similar problem too. I will write my problem
and the solution for it:
I'm indexing docs and every parsed document is stored in an ArrayList.
This solution worked for little directories with a little number of
files in it but when the things ar
Hi!
I have a problem regarding the integration of a PageRank score to the existing
TF.IDF based one provided by lucene. I already have a database with PageRank
values, but where should I start integration? I have a pretty simple setup,
only very few fields (all but two unstored). Can I use the
13 matches
Mail list logo
