Re: Results ranking on filtered multi-field query

2005-05-02 Thread Doug Cutting
Chuck Williams wrote: I found this to be a problem as well and created alternative classes, DistributedMultiFieldQueryParser and MaxDisjunctionQuery, which are available here: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32674 You might check these out and see if they provide the ranking y

Re: Results ranking on filtered multi-field query

2005-05-02 Thread Chuck Williams
Mike Baranczak wrote: I substituted DistributedMultiFieldQueryParser for MultiFieldQueryParser, leaving everything else the same, and now it works. Thanks for your help. Any chance that these classes, or something like them, will be included in the main distribution at some point? There was a p

Re: Results ranking on filtered multi-field query

2005-05-02 Thread Mike Baranczak
On May 1, 2005, at 7:34 PM, Chuck Williams wrote: Mike Baranczak wrote: I'm building a search engine that searches multiple document fields by default. Given a query string like "Bruce Lee", I would expect the results list to first show the documents containing both "Bruce" and "Lee", and then t

Re: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-05-02 Thread Paul Elschot
On Monday 02 May 2005 06:01, Yonik Seeley wrote: > I can't say whats actually ready, but I am very interested in sparse > filter representations. I'm working on a project that needs to > dynamic categorization of search results, and this requires caching > thousands of filters. The need for many