Kevin, have you tried interning Terms, and did that have the desired
effect?
Otis
--- "Kevin A. Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We nighly optimizing one of our main indexes which takes up about 70%
> of
> system memory when loaded due to Term objects being stored in memory.
>
> We perform
I know *I* found it of interest... :)
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Nobody posted a link, but I'm sure lots of people here would be
interested in TSS' interview with Doug Cutting:
http://theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=32509
--
Nobody posted a link, but I'm sure lots of people here would be
interested in TSS' interview with Doug Cutting:
http://theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=32509
Otis
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:47:50 +0100, Daniel Naber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 11 March 2005 16:35, Chris D wrote:
>
> > Is there an issue with Tomcat and large indexes? Should I be looking
> > elsewhere for a solution?
>
> Are you sure tomcat uses the same lucene.jar as your standalone
On Friday 11 March 2005 16:35, Chris D wrote:
> Is there an issue with Tomcat and large indexes? Should I be looking
> elsewhere for a solution?
Are you sure tomcat uses the same lucene.jar as your standalone test does?
Regards
Daniel
--
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:31:43 -0500, Chris D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been playing with the webapp and attempting to search over two
> indexes that I've created. The first was 700M the second is 2.3G.
>
> When the webapp attempts to search the second I get a
> "ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptio
Look at http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/fileformats.html
You should also buy "Lucene in action" which explain the structure of the
index.
Claude Libois
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical associate - Unisys
- Original Message -
From: "Nicolas Maisonneuve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users
