Hi
Guys.
Apologies
U got it bingo,Am trying to do something similar as u replied.
But there is a glitch in the process
If the search is done on the 'leaf_category' as u said
with word such as 'CAMERA DIGITAL' instead of 'DIGITAL CAMERA' the
resultant
return hits will be
Hi folks,
I have a task when I need to read the query entered by the user and then add to
it many other terms in a boolean expression.
for examples: if the user enters: red. i need to take red and generate the
following query(red AND blue) OR (red AND green) OR( red AND yellow). the
problem is
Did you reindex after upgrading?
Erik
On Mar 9, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Luke Shannon wrote:
Hi;
Has the scoring changed recently? I just upgraded all the jars is our
application (Lucene included).
I'm getting scores like this from documents in hits:
6.9699495E-4
The XSL that creates the user inte
Hi;
Has the scoring changed recently? I just upgraded all the jars is our
application (Lucene included).
I'm getting scores like this from documents in hits:
6.9699495E-4
The XSL that creates the user interface converts the score to an int and
than display it. This currently resulting in a zero
Since you own Lucene in Action, look at this:
http://www.lucenebook.com/search?query=highlighter+context
See section 8.7, Highlighting query terms.
Otis
--- Andy Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using Lucene for a few months now, although not in a
> typical
> "building a
Try <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Jerry Jalenak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The e-mail address for unsubscribing from the list appears to not be
> working. Can someone check on it?
>
> Jerry Jalenak
> Senior Programmer / Analyst, Web Publishing
> LabOne, Inc.
> 10101 Renner Blvd.
> Lenexa, KS 66219
Yonik Seeley wrote:
I'm trying to support an interface where documents can be added one at
a time at a high rate (via HTTP POST). You don't know all of the
documents ahead of time, so you can't delete them all ahead of time.
A simple solution is to queue documents as they're posted. When either
Hi,
I've been using Lucene for a few months now, although not in a typical
"building a search engine" kind of way*. Basically, I have some large
documents. I would like a system whereby I search for a term, and then I
receive a hit for each match, with its context, e.g., ten words either side
I'm trying to support an interface where documents can be added one at
a time at a high rate (via HTTP POST). You don't know all of the
documents ahead of time, so you can't delete them all ahead of time.
Given this constraint, it seems like you can do one of two things:
1) collect all the docume
+1
Erik
On Mar 9, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Hmmm... would not java.lang.Package various methods do the job?
I'm not sure... I just tried to do
Package.getPackage("org.apache.lucene") and got null, even though the
manifest is present in the JAR.
I looked
On Mar 9, 2005, at 10:09 AM, javier muguruza wrote:
(I sent this to the old list, I dont know wether it reached the
list...just in case I repost it)
Hi all,
We index our documents in the following way:
doc = new Document();
// mailid
doc.add(Field.UnIndexed("mid",mid));
thanks Miles, yes... i missed that the queryParser could transform a query..
but i don't like very much my idea: the integration is too high level.
it would be great if a low level of integration will be possible
because of the scorer.
In fact the calcul of score will certainly more complex. Act
Yonik Seeley wrote:
This strategy looks very promising.
One drawback is that documents must be added directly to the main
index for this to be efficient. This is a bit of a problem if there
is a document uniqueness requirement (a unique id field).
This is easy to do with a single index. Here's th
Scott Smith wrote:
I have the need to create an index which will potentially have a
million+ documents. I know Lucene can accomplish this. However, the
other requirement is that I need to be continually updating it during
the date (adding 1-30 documents/minute).
Have a look at this thread:
http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry Hawkins wrote:
[...]
| ~I am trying to access the original announcement of the move to
| Subversion so I can perform an anonymous checkout of the codebase. If
| anyone has succeeded in that, I would appreciate any tips. My current
| attempt
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Hmmm... would not java.lang.Package various methods do the job?
I'm not sure... I just tried to do
Package.getPackage("org.apache.lucene") and got null, even though the
manifest is present in the JAR.
I looked into this. The package name in the manifest is
"org/apache/l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
List,
~I receive a stack trace indicating a Velocity template processing
error when trying to access the Janary 2005 archive[0] for this list.
The stack trace is appended to the end of this message.
~I am trying to access the original announceme
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 18:29 +0100, Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote:
> I would like use a index with structured search field.
>
> - flat index (lucene type)
> searchfield1
> searchfield2
> searchffield3
> ...
> -structured index
> search1
>search2
> search4
>search3
> search5
>
> to
oups ..
2- According to the table , a new Query is created with just non zero
boost search field search2:coco^search2_boost
search4:coco^search4_boost
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:53:41 +0100, Nicolas Maisonneuve
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm a idea would be to create dynamically a boost table (f
hmm a idea would be to create dynamically a boost table (field,
boostvalue) in a extended version of a TermQuery depending on the
field:
ex: StructuredTermQuery ("search2", "coco")
1-> Update a boost table according to:
* the virtual structure :
> -structured index
> search1
>search2
>
The e-mail address for unsubscribing from the list appears to not be
working. Can someone check on it?
Jerry Jalenak
Senior Programmer / Analyst, Web Publishing
LabOne, Inc.
10101 Renner Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
(913) 577-1496
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This transmission (and any information attached to
hy everybody,
I would like use a index with structured search field.
- flat index (lucene type)
searchfield1
searchfield2
searchffield3
...
-structured index
search1
search2
search4
search3
search5
to allow simple extensions of some search features:
- the query TermQuery(
This strategy looks very promising.
One drawback is that documents must be added directly to the main
index for this to be efficient. This is a bit of a problem if there
is a document uniqueness requirement (a unique id field).
If one takes the approach of adding docs to a separate lucene index
(I sent this to the old list, I dont know wether it reached the
list...just in case I repost it)
Hi all,
We index our documents in the following way:
doc = new Document();
// mailid
doc.add(Field.UnIndexed("mid",mid));
//body
doc.add(Field.UnStored("body",
On Mar 9, 2005, at 7:40 AM, sergiu gordea wrote:
Unfortunately I don't have a lucene project on my computer as this
moment and I cannot check myself,
do the tests for MultiFieldQueryParser also pass?
I haven't tried it, though I'm sure it'd be fine since it relies on
QueryParser. Since I have no
On Mar 9, 2005, at 7:25 AM, sergiu gordea wrote:
transformations to be reversible
(I mean something like Query => String => Query, with the constraint
initial query equals final query).
Ok ... I give up ... if this feature is to hard to be implemented,
the soltution will be to work around in my
It's not clear what you're trying to achieve. PhraseQuery and
SpanNearQuery can help you find tokens that are close to each other. It
you're using the standard analyzer, tokens are words. They won't help
you group documents under a topic.
You should setup some other fields in your Lucene document
Hi Guys
Apologies
Some body Please Help me for this Form
with regards
Karthik
-Original Message-
From: Miles Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 3:02 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SPAN QUERY [HOW TO]
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 14:52 +0530,
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Mar 8, 2005, at 5:17 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
Earlier in this thread...
: >>> +a -> a
: >>
: >> Hmmm this is a debatable one. It's returning a TermQuery in
this
: >> case for "a". Is that appropriate? Or should it return a
: >> BooleanQuery
: >> with a single TermQu
Chris Hostetter wrote:
Earlier in this thread...
: >>> +a -> a
: >>
: >> Hmmm this is a debatable one. It's returning a TermQuery in this
: >> case for "a". Is that appropriate? Or should it return a
: >> BooleanQuery
: >> with a single TermQuery as required?
: > Ok.
: > The question how to
Doug Cutting wrote:
sergiu gordea wrote:
So .. here is an example of how I parse a simple query string
provided by a user ...
the user checks a few flags and writes "test ko AND NOT bo"
and the resulting query.toString() is saved in the database:
+(+(subject:test description:test keywordsTerms:te
PA wrote:
On Mar 09, 2005, at 11:30, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
I'm not sure... I just tried to do
Package.getPackage("org.apache.lucene") and got null, even though the
manifest is present in the JAR.
Packages are only defined when their underlying class has been already
loaded...
http://alt.t
Hello,
Here is some dydoc for Lucene 1.4.3:
http://alt.textdrive.com/assets/public/lucene-1.4.3/
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.cls.html
The entire Lucene dydoc is available for download as well:
http://alt.textdrive.com/assets/public/lucene-1.4.3.tar.gz
dydoc is an alternative documentation
On Mar 09, 2005, at 11:30, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
I'm not sure... I just tried to do
Package.getPackage("org.apache.lucene") and got null, even though the
manifest is present in the JAR.
Packages are only defined when their underlying class has been already
loaded...
http://alt.textdrive.co
PA wrote:
On Mar 09, 2005, at 09:49, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Besides, it doesn't work with WebStart, because the classpath is not
accessible.
Hmmm... would not java.lang.Package various methods do the job?
I'm not sure... I just tried to do
Package.getPackage("org.apache.lucene") and got null, e
Hi
Guys
Apologies..
Yes some similar concept in my head is thundering.
I will be using a field 'text' for the same
Can u guys please tell me using spanQuery or pahrse Query would do the job
,If so How to proceeed.
Thx in advance
Karthik
-Original Message-
From: Miles Barr [
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 15:06 +0530, Natarajan.T wrote:
> How to I store indexing files remotely.
>
> For example indexing process running in machine A, then HoHoI want to
> store index files in machine B.
There's no built in support in Lucene to have remote directories. You
can do something at the
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 14:52 +0530, Karthik N S wrote:
> The new Feature of lucene 'span query' really is interesting
>
> But need expert suggestions on achieveing the same.
>
> I have 3 documents
>
> Document 1 contains = ELECTRONICS DIGITAL CAMERA
> Document 2 contains = ELECTRONICS D
Hi,
How to I store indexing files remotely.
For example indexing process running in machine A, then HoHoI want to
store index files in machine B.
Regards,
Natarajan.
Hi
Guys
Apologies..
The new
Feature of lucene 'span query' really is interesting
But need
expert suggestions on achieveing the same.
I have 3
documents Document 1
contains = ELECTRONICS DIGITAL CAMERA Document 2
contains = ELECTRONICS DIGITAL
CAMERA 0PTICSDocument 3 co
On Mar 09, 2005, at 09:49, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Besides, it doesn't work with WebStart, because the classpath is not
accessible.
Hmmm... would not java.lang.Package various methods do the job?
Cheers
--
PA, Onnay Equitursay
http://alt.textdrive.com/
-
Can you do a Lucene.class.getResource("/META-INF/ and read the info
from there manually? This should return JAR-relative URL and thus should
work with Java WebStart.
D.
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Bill Janssen wrote:
The JDK comes with some classes that will let you get to
that elegantly.
You m
Bill Janssen wrote:
The JDK comes with some classes that will let you get to
that elegantly.
You mean clumsily :-).
Besides, it doesn't work with WebStart, because the classpath is not
accessible.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __
[__ ||
43 matches
Mail list logo