Re: complexType with simpleContent facet violation message not helpful

2007-11-05 Thread Michael Glavassevich
Hi Ron, Ron Gavlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/05/2007 02:32:09 PM: > Hi Michael, > > Do you have an SVN commit # for this fix? The SVN rev # is 591458. > Does Xerces publish > nightly source and binary distribution builds anywhere that I can > pick up rather than having to build Xerces mys

Re: complexType with simpleContent facet violation message not helpful

2007-11-05 Thread Ron Gavlin
AIL PROTECTED]> To: j-users@xerces.apache.org Sent: Friday, November 2, 2007 5:01:12 PM Subject: Re: complexType with simpleContent facet violation message not helpful Hi Ron, We weren't assigning an anonymous type name to the simple type. I just committed a fix for that. If you pickup the c

Re: complexType with simpleContent facet violation message not helpful

2007-11-02 Thread Michael Glavassevich
Hi Ron, We weren't assigning an anonymous type name to the simple type. I just committed a fix for that. If you pickup the current code from SVN you should get "#AnonType_Comment2Type" instead of "null" as the type name in the error message. Thanks. Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IB

complexType with simpleContent facet violation message not helpful

2007-10-30 Thread Ron Gavlin
I have a maxLength facet on a complexType with simpleContent that extends a base complexType. Schema validation performed by the included program with the included schemas & xml file results in the stack trace listed below. Note the message refers to the relevant anonymous type as [type 'null']