Okay, thanks again Michael.
On 6/21/10 9:52 PM, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Hi Chad,
Chad La Joie wrote on 06/21/2010 08:56:00 PM:
> Hey Michael, I also meant to ask, while the Xerces serializer is
> deprecated, do you happen to know if any significant issuer were found
> and fixed in the
Hi Chad,
Chad La Joie wrote on 06/21/2010 08:56:00 PM:
> Hey Michael, I also meant to ask, while the Xerces serializer is
> deprecated, do you happen to know if any significant issuer were found
> and fixed in the Xalan-resident code? Just wondering if we'd be trading
> on potential problem fo
Hey Michael, I also meant to ask, while the Xerces serializer is
deprecated, do you happen to know if any significant issuer were found
and fixed in the Xalan-resident code? Just wondering if we'd be trading
on potential problem for one or more known problems.
Thanks again.
On 6/21/10 1:57 P
Thanks Michael,
I don't consider it dire yet, though the people with the broken code
might. :) I'll give your suggestion a shot and see what happens.
Would be nice to have an optional switch though. So hopefully it'll get
added.
On 6/21/10 1:57 PM, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Hi Chad,
C
Hi Chad,
Chad La Joie wrote on 06/21/2010 10:18:58 AM:
> Let me preface this by saying that to my understanding Xerces-J and
> Xalan-J now share a common LSSerializer implementations and that this
> implementation is held and maintained by Xalan.
That's correct.
> If that's not true let
> me
