-
> us...@xerces.apache.org
> Date: 04/23/2018 08:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [REVISED VOTE]: Xerces-J 2.12.0 release
>
> Hi all,
>The 1st voting for Xerces-J 2.12.0 release was stopped, due to
> certain issues that were in the release candidates (RC) that were
> found by the reviewers ([
+1
Thanks for the work everyone!
Gareth
> On Apr 23, 2018, at 1:06 PM, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>The 1st voting for Xerces-J 2.12.0 release was stopped, due to certain
> issues that were in the release candidates (RC) that were found by the
> reviewers ([5]). Those have been fi
Gandhi [mailto:muk...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 1:05 AM
To: j-...@xerces.apache.org
Cc: priv...@xerces.apache.org; j-users@xerces.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE]: Xerces-J 2.12.0 Release
Hi Michael & all,
I've fixed all the below mentioned issues that were
Hi all,
The 1st voting for Xerces-J 2.12.0 release was stopped, due to certain
issues that were in the release candidates (RC) that were found by the
reviewers ([5]). Those have been fixed now, and I'm initiating this new
mail for the Vote for new RC.
I've uploaded Xerces-J 2.12.0 release candi
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> > I alone can't decide on this (though I sort of agree with you). Lets see
> how
> > others react to the topic of having or not having MD5 hashes, and we can
> > accordingly finalize as this voting concludes.
>
> The ASF policy was updated recently,
On 23 April 2018 at 11:04, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 3:19 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> Contains MD5 hashes; these are deprecated and should be removed.
>
>
> I alone can't decide on this (though I sort of agree with you). Lets see how
> others react to the topic of having or not havin
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 3:19 PM, sebb wrote:
Contains MD5 hashes; these are deprecated and should be removed.
>
I alone can't decide on this (though I sort of agree with you). Lets see
how others react to the topic of having or not having MD5 hashes, and we
can accordingly finalize as this votin
On 21 April 2018 at 06:27, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> Hi all,
>The 1st voting for Xerces-J 2.12.0 release was stopped, due to certain
> issues that were in the release candidates (RC) that were found by the
> reviewers ([5]). Those have been fixed now, and I'm initiating this new mail
> for the Vot
Hi all,
The 1st voting for Xerces-J 2.12.0 release was stopped, due to certain
issues that were in the release candidates (RC) that were found by the
reviewers ([5]). Those have been fixed now, and I'm initiating this new
mail for the Vote for new RC.
I've uploaded Xerces-J 2.12.0 release candi
Hi Michael & all,
I've fixed all the below mentioned issues that were found in previous
RC, within the revised RC for 2.12.0 release. I'll shortly be writing a
separate mail, for the Vote for new RC.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Michael Glavassevich
wrote:
> Should fix the copyright years
Hi all,
I've uploaded Xerces-J 2.12.0 release candidates to [1] for review. In
this release candidate there are two sets of packages, the main release
built from the trunk [2] and the XML Schema 1.1 release built from the XML
Schema 1.1 development branch [3]. The change summary is available he
11 matches
Mail list logo
