Re: [Request] Xerces-J: XML Schema 1.1 feature feedback

2007-11-19 Thread Michael Glavassevich
Hi Prashant, Historically JAXP has just referenced the relevant W3C (and other) specifications for the majority of its conformance requirements. I'd be a bit surprised if it said anything about this (if no doc from the Schema Working Group does). If the schema 1.0 processor you're using doesn't s

Re: [Request] Xerces-J: XML Schema 1.1 feature feedback

2007-11-15 Thread Prashant Reddy
Hello Michael, Thank you for the clarification. Does this mean that the JAXP specification needs to be cognizant of this feature ? Thank you, -Prashant On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 23:19 -0500, Michael Glavassevich wrote: > Probably worth pointing out that in order to be immediately useful to > users

Re: [Request] Xerces-J: XML Schema 1.1 feature feedback

2007-11-15 Thread Michael Glavassevich
Probably worth pointing out that in order to be immediately useful to users, the conditional inclusion [1] feature would need to be supported in XML Schema 1.0 processors as well. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xmlschema11-1-20070830/#cip Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto

Fw: [Request] Xerces-J: XML Schema 1.1 feature feedback

2007-11-12 Thread Michael Glavassevich
(Forwarding some feedback from Nathan to j-users ...) Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/09/2007 11:25:06 PM: > I don't have any specific scenarios of use at the moment, but the > assertio

Re: [Request] Xerces-J: XML Schema 1.1 feature feedback

2007-11-12 Thread Prashant Reddy
Hello: 1. Conditional Inclusion 2. Assertions These features are what we are most interested in. Scenarios : 1. Conditional Inclusion : The example XML snippet which employs the "condition inclusion" along with XMLSchema-versioning is a very compelling use case for us. 2. Assertions : Similar

Re: [Request] Xerces-J: XML Schema 1.1 feature feedback

2007-11-10 Thread Florian Wendland
Hi all, i would propose these features: Conditional Inclusion Assertions Enhanced Wildcards All Group Conditional Type Assignment These are very interesting improvements for xsd imho thx --mfw Khaled Noaman schrieb: Hi, The W3C Schema WG has released a last call working draft of XML Schema

Re: [Request] Xerces-J: XML Schema 1.1 feature feedback

2007-11-09 Thread Eric J. Schwarzenbach
My first vote would be for _Complex Type Restriction_. I've spent countless hours in the past bashing my head against the spec when trying to do something with restriction that intuitively made sense (and would be valid according to subset logic) but which ran afoul of the byzantine rules that gove

[Request] Xerces-J: XML Schema 1.1 feature feedback

2007-11-09 Thread Khaled Noaman
Hi, The W3C Schema WG has released a last call working draft of XML Schema 1.1 Part 1: Structures. We are considering implementing features from this draft in Xerces-J. We would like to understand which features users are most interested in and what scenarios they plan on using them in. Here's