You missed the point. If I publish an artifact to maven when my artifact
depends on xerces, my users will come at me with pitch forks.
Original message
From: "Eric J. Schwarzenbach"
Date: 5/10/18 5:28 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: j-users@xerces.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT
For Apache Commons, how well did that work for improving activity?
Michael Glavassevich
XML Technologies and WAS Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org
Dave Brosius wrote on 05/10/2018 05:15:22 PM:
> From: Dave Brosius
> To: j-users@xerces.apache.or
On 05/10/2018 02:39 AM, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Dave Brosius
mailto:dbros...@mebigfatguy.com>> wrote:
Yes, but if i want to publish an artifact to maven, and my
artifact depends on xerces, are you expecting all the users of my
artifact to do
What Apache Commons did, in a similar circumstance was unilaterally open
up committership to all commons projects to a much wider audience.
Perhaps Xerces should consider doing that as well.
On 05/10/2018 01:48 PM, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Folks, it took us 7 years and 5 months to get a new
Oops, typo:
implemented of fixed in Xerces --> implemented or fixed in Xerces.
Michael Glavassevich
XML Technologies and WAS Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org
"Michael Glavassevich" wrote on 05/10/2018 01:48:52
PM:
> From: "Michael Glavassevic
Folks, it took us 7 years and 5 months to get a new release out. I would
hope that alone would make it evident that this project needs more help
from the community if it's going to keep moving forward.
I see at least a few people feel strongly about Maven and would encourage
them to contribute.
