Re: [POLL]: Dropping JDK 1.3 support for Xerces-J?

2010-07-10 Thread Michael Glavassevich
Dave, Dave Brosius wrote on 07/08/2010 02:27:41 PM: > the end of life on 1.4 was fall 2008! You must only be thinking of Oracle/Sun and even they still support it if you pay [1]. Keep in mind that there are other vendors (for example IBM [2]) that support it as well and have end of service dat

Re: [POLL]: Dropping JDK 1.3 support for Xerces-J?

2010-07-10 Thread Dave Brosius
the end of life on 1.4 was fall 2008! +1 in going to 1.5 directly Michael Glavassevich wrote: > >Hi Jake, > >"Jacob Kjome" wrote on 07/08/2010 12:58:49 PM: > >> I have a library I develop (XMLC [1]) that depends on JDK1.3 and also >depends >> on Xerces.  That said, part of the reason of depen

Re: [POLL]: Dropping JDK 1.3 support for Xerces-J?

2010-07-10 Thread sebb
+1 for dropping support for 1.3 1.5 has a better memory model but as far as I know, this is part of the JVM, rather than depending on the compiler, i.e. merely running under 1.5 will help (please correct me if I'm wrong!). Switching to 1.5 involves a lot of work initially (generics, annotations) b