[jira] [Created] (SOLR-16360) Atomic update on boolean fields doesn't reflect when value starts with "1", "t" or "T"

Rahul Goswami created SOLR-16360: Summary: Atomic update on boolean fields doesn't reflect when value starts with "1", "t" or "T" Key: SOLR-16360 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16360

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-17038) /admin/segments handler: Expose the term count

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17812137#comment-17812137 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-17038: -- I am working on this. > /admin/segments han

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-17038) /admin/segments handler: Expose the term count

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17812137#comment-17812137 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-17038 at 1/30/24 4:23 AM:

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-17186) Streaming query breaks if token contains backtick

Rahul Goswami created SOLR-17186: Summary: Streaming query breaks if token contains backtick Key: SOLR-17186 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17186 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bu

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-17186) Streaming query breaks if token contains backtick

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17821399#comment-17821399 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-17186: -- Root cause seems to be replacement of ` with

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16703) Clearing all documents of an index should delete traces of a previous Lucene version

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17845135#comment-17845135 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-16703: -- I have done some work in this area and happy

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16703) Clearing all documents of an index should delete traces of a previous Lucene version

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17845135#comment-17845135 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-16703 at 5/9/24 10:01 PM:

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

Rahul Goswami created SOLR-16838: Summary: Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7 Key: SOLR-16838 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17729551#comment-17729551 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-16838: -- I ran the test to index 5 million docs (batc

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17729558#comment-17729558 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-16838: -- Running further benchmarks reveals that the

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17729558#comment-17729558 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-16838 at 6/6/23 3:51 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17729921#comment-17729921 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-16838: -- Yes, it has always been commented out. For r

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17729921#comment-17729921 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-16838 at 6/7/23 4:04 AM: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17729921#comment-17729921 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-16838 at 6/7/23 4:05 AM: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17729921#comment-17729921 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-16838 at 6/7/23 4:05 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17730247#comment-17730247 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-16838: -- The regression seems to be in the Lucene lay

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17730247#comment-17730247 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-16838 at 6/7/23 6:41 PM: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17730247#comment-17730247 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-16838 at 6/7/23 6:42 PM: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17730247#comment-17730247 ] Rahul Goswami edited comment on SOLR-16838 at 6/7/23 9:32 PM: -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17730680#comment-17730680 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-16838: -- Not sure about Mmap, but NIOFSDirectory also

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17742498#comment-17742498 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-16838: -- Missed the last couple of comments, sorry! [

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16838) Atomic updates too slow in Solr 8 vs Solr 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17742504#comment-17742504 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-16838: -- [~elyograg] In some scenarios, the problem w

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16360) Atomic update on boolean fields doesn't reflect when value starts with "1", "t" or "T"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17750535#comment-17750535 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-16360: -- RCA: during a regular (non-atomic) update, t

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-17359) Make SolrCLI handle arg parsing of zk sub commands

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17873592#comment-17873592 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-17359: -- Thanks for your work on this Eric. This was

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7962) Passing additional arguments to solr.cmd using "-a" does not work on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17905719#comment-17905719 ] Rahul Goswami commented on SOLR-7962: - I’ll try this and report back > Passing additi