[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16872) Support split shards in distributed join

2023-07-20 Thread Ilan Ginzburg (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17744994#comment-17744994 ] Ilan Ginzburg commented on SOLR-16872: -- If before split the colocation constraint ho

[GitHub] [solr] epugh commented on pull request #1784: SOLR-16842: Make "version" just another Tool.

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
epugh commented on PR #1784: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1784#issuecomment-1643679668 Ouch!That makes sense now that I look. I thought that the PostTool had been back ported to 9x…. I need to look again at the discussion thread on what we decided, maybe 10x only….

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16812) Support CBOR format for update/query

2023-07-20 Thread Mark Robert Miller (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745047#comment-17745047 ] Mark Robert Miller commented on SOLR-16812: --- If you took these benchmarks and d

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16812) Support CBOR format for update/query

2023-07-20 Thread Noble Paul (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745073#comment-17745073 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-16812: --- It's an opt-in format which should have zero impac

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16812) Support CBOR format for update/query

2023-07-20 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745087#comment-17745087 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-16812: - > If you took these benchmark

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16812) Support CBOR format for update/query

2023-07-20 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745087#comment-17745087 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya edited comment on SOLR-16812 at 7/20/23 1:40 PM: -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16812) Support CBOR format for update/query

2023-07-20 Thread Noble Paul (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745090#comment-17745090 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-16812: --- Yes, anyone else would have reported such a commen

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16812) Support CBOR format for update/query

2023-07-20 Thread Jason Gerlowski (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745102#comment-17745102 ] Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-16812: bq. If you think the performance is slow

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16812) Support CBOR format for update/query

2023-07-20 Thread Jason Gerlowski (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745102#comment-17745102 ] Jason Gerlowski edited comment on SOLR-16812 at 7/20/23 2:07 PM: --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16812) Support CBOR format for update/query

2023-07-20 Thread Jason Gerlowski (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745102#comment-17745102 ] Jason Gerlowski edited comment on SOLR-16812 at 7/20/23 2:10 PM: --

[GitHub] [solr-operator] anilkhichar opened a new issue, #593: Could not find a backup repository with name `solr-backup-s3-repo`

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
anilkhichar opened a new issue, #593: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/593 Please suggest any pointers for debugging. Is there any API where we can get the list of SolrOperator registered backup repositories? Also, for S3 backup, does the Operator first download

[GitHub] [solr-operator] HoustonPutman commented on issue #593: Could not find a backup repository with name `solr-backup-s3-repo`

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
HoustonPutman commented on issue #593: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/593#issuecomment-1644070170 What version of Solr are you running? The Solr Operator just enables use of the existing Solr Backup repositories: https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/deployment-guid

[GitHub] [solr-operator] anilkhichar commented on issue #593: Could not find a backup repository with name `solr-backup-s3-repo`

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
anilkhichar commented on issue #593: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/593#issuecomment-1644229419 Thank you @HoustonPutman for looking into this. We are using Solr 9.2.0 with SolrOperator 0.5.1. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respo

[GitHub] [solr-operator] HoustonPutman commented on issue #593: Could not find a backup repository with name `solr-backup-s3-repo`

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
HoustonPutman commented on issue #593: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/593#issuecomment-1644233084 Can you provide your full SolrCloud specification? Are you using a custom solr xml, if so then you will need to add the backup repository yourself. -- This is an automate

[GitHub] [solr] patsonluk commented on pull request #1784: SOLR-16842: Make "version" just another Tool.

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
patsonluk commented on PR #1784: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1784#issuecomment-1644334031 @epugh Would it work if we have this PR to remove it from branch_9x? 😊 https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1799 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond t

[GitHub] [solr] patsonluk opened a new pull request, #1799: SOLR-16842: Remove reference to PostTool for branch_9x

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
patsonluk opened a new pull request, #1799: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1799 # Description A merge from master to branch_9x includes reference to `PostTool` which is not available in 9x # Solution Removed the reference to `PostTool`. This branch is based

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16812) Support CBOR format for update/query

2023-07-20 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745220#comment-17745220 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-16812: - Reasonable benchmarks are post

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-16812) Support CBOR format for update/query

2023-07-20 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745220#comment-17745220 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya edited comment on SOLR-16812 at 7/20/23 7:02 PM: -

[GitHub] [solr] HoustonPutman merged pull request #1799: SOLR-16842: Remove reference to PostTool for branch_9x

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
HoustonPutman merged PR #1799: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1799 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apa

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16842) Eliminate special case code in solrCLI by introducing VersionTool

2023-07-20 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745242#comment-17745242 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-16842: Commit 8

[GitHub] [solr] HoustonPutman commented on pull request #1799: SOLR-16842: Remove reference to PostTool for branch_9x

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
HoustonPutman commented on PR #1799: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1799#issuecomment-1644473617 Ran precommit and integration tests locally, which both passed. Thanks @patsonluk ! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

[GitHub] [solr] epugh commented on pull request #1799: SOLR-16842: Remove reference to PostTool for branch_9x

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
epugh commented on PR #1799: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1799#issuecomment-1644646005 Thank you @HoustonPutman and @patsonluk for this! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to g

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16812) Support CBOR format for update/query

2023-07-20 Thread Noble Paul (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17745316#comment-17745316 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-16812: --- {quote} I think his concern is more around "proces

[GitHub] [solr] dsmiley commented on a diff in pull request #1793: SOLR-16825: Generate v2 API SolrRequest bindings

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
dsmiley commented on code in PR #1793: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1793#discussion_r1270167635 ## solr/solrj-model/src/test/org/apache/solr/model/DummyTest.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +package org.apache.solr.model; + +import org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4; +import or

[GitHub] [solr] dsmiley commented on a diff in pull request #1793: SOLR-16825: Generate v2 API SolrRequest bindings

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
dsmiley commented on code in PR #1793: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1793#discussion_r1270165715 ## solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/util/ModelConstants.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + *

[GitHub] [solr] patsonluk opened a new pull request, #1800: SOLR-16871: Synchronize on a larger block to avoid race condition in CoordinatorHttpSolrCall init

2023-07-20 Thread via GitHub
patsonluk opened a new pull request, #1800: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1800 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16871 # Description While the previous fix #1762 does seem to avoid race condition, unfortunately, it was still happening on some test runs,