github-actions[bot] commented on PR #2199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2199#issuecomment-2484420270
This PR has had no activity for 60 days and is now labeled as stale. Any
new activity will remove the stale label. To attract more reviewers, please
tag people who might be fam
dsmiley commented on PR #2199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2199#issuecomment-2358965812
@noblepaul status on this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #2199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2199#issuecomment-2019129031
This PR had no visible activity in the past 60 days, labeling it as stale.
Any new activity will remove the stale label. To attract more reviewers, please
tag someone or notify t
hiteshk25 commented on PR #2199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2199#issuecomment-1904395389
do we log somewhere whether collection has prs(or not)?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
noblepaul commented on PR #2199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2199#issuecomment-1903290421
>Should we instead have this default at the lowest level to being
randomized, or otherwise ensure that nothing (either now or future) falls
through the cracks?
I think we should exp
magibney commented on PR #2199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2199#issuecomment-1894015934
Should we instead have this default at the lowest level to being randomized,
or otherwise ensure that nothing (either now or future) falls through the
cracks?
This would yield a much
