joel-bernstein commented on PR #1094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1094#issuecomment-1285592668
@HoustonPutman, I'll focus on the move to solrj-streaming since thats what
is needed for 9x.
For Solr 10 we can decide between a module or solr-core. I'm fine with
either appro
joel-bernstein commented on PR #1094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1094#issuecomment-1285561544
For this PR I'll focus on the move to solrj-streaming as that cleans things
up in Solrj.
I'll open another ticket to discuss the deprecation and creation of the
server side mod
joel-bernstein commented on PR #1094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1094#issuecomment-1285539059
It is possible that people are using a more broad set of classes on the
client side. Which would indeed break if they are removed. So I see your point
about waiting for 10 for splitti
joel-bernstein commented on PR #1094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1094#issuecomment-1285530094
@risdenk, I'm curious why it all needs to stay client?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
joel-bernstein commented on PR #1094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1094#issuecomment-1285503975
As part of the solrj-streaming module I will add documentation for using the
Java API. There is a massive amount of documentation for streaming expressions
on the server side but noth
joel-bernstein commented on PR #1094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1094#issuecomment-1285500456
If people are ok with this approach I will keep this PR alive and continue
working on the server side module. Once thats done, I'll migrate a small set of
classes to solrj-streaming.
joel-bernstein commented on PR #1094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1094#issuecomment-1285498590
Another way to split the classes between server and client side module is
any class that has a Java API test case can stay in Solrj. 98% of the classes
only have streaming expression
joel-bernstein commented on PR #1094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1094#issuecomment-1285488578
Ok, I like the idea of keeping a very small workable subset of classes in
Solrj and moving the rest along with the /stream handler etc... to a server
side module. The best supported T
joel-bernstein commented on PR #1094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1094#issuecomment-1285456616
Before I close this PR and start to work on a solrj-streaming PR lets be
sure we don't want this to be server module.
The original streaming classes were designed to be a Java A
