Re: [PR] SOLR-17198: AttributeFetcher no longer fails when it observes multiple shard leaders [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
dsmiley commented on PR #2335: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2335#issuecomment-1985044638 BTW I looked into the test failure in the first run; can't have anything to do with this PR. I filed https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2337 to avoid that NPE. -- This is an automated m

Re: [PR] Update dependency com.tdunning:t-digest to v3.3 [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
solrbot commented on PR #2136: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2136#issuecomment-1985017934 ### Edited/Blocked Notification Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

Re: [PR] Make parameter descriptions consistent in faceting.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
cdrini commented on code in PR #2162: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2162#discussion_r1517147908 ## solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/query-guide/pages/faceting.adoc: ## @@ -168,7 +166,7 @@ The `facet.offset` parameter indicates an offset into the list of constraints to |O

Re: [PR] Make parameter descriptions consistent in faceting.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
cdrini commented on code in PR #2162: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2162#discussion_r1517147908 ## solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/query-guide/pages/faceting.adoc: ## @@ -168,7 +166,7 @@ The `facet.offset` parameter indicates an offset into the list of constraints to |O

Re: [PR] Make parameter descriptions consistent in faceting.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
cdrini commented on PR #2162: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2162#issuecomment-1985016847 Thanks for the review @cpoerschke ! Ok @epugh , this should be ready to go now! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitH

Re: [PR] Make parameter descriptions consistent in faceting.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
cdrini commented on code in PR #2162: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2162#discussion_r1517147908 ## solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/query-guide/pages/faceting.adoc: ## @@ -168,7 +166,7 @@ The `facet.offset` parameter indicates an offset into the list of constraints to |O

Re: [PR] Make parameter descriptions consistent in faceting.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
cdrini commented on PR #2162: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2162#issuecomment-1985010050 Ah apologies for the delay! Will update this week :+1: -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above t

Re: [PR] Update dependency com.tdunning:t-digest to v3.3 [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
risdenk commented on PR #2136: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2136#issuecomment-1984985404 Pushed e0d36967626d1e261c172739974d534dc81ce219 updating the assertions in the percentiles for tests. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message

Re: [PR] Update dependency com.tdunning:t-digest to v3.3 [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
risdenk commented on PR #2136: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2136#issuecomment-1984975758 The nitty gritty details look to be here: https://github.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/171 and https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/3634 basically f

Re: [PR] Update dependency com.tdunning:t-digest to v3.3 [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
risdenk commented on PR #2136: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2136#issuecomment-1984966867 t-digest 3.2 looks fine but 3.3 seems to have different stats assertions? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

Re: [PR] SOLR-16866: Deleting a non-existent directory should not fail [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
risdenk commented on PR #2336: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2336#issuecomment-1984950183 The stack trace to me looks like it could be there are 2 things doing the delete and its a race condition who gets there first? Otherwise I don't see how we would end up getting this excepti

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-17106) LBSolrClient: Make it configurable to remove zombie ping checks

2024-03-07 Thread Chris M. Hostetter (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824591#comment-17824591 ] Chris M. Hostetter commented on SOLR-17106: --- Hi Aparna, This looks pretty good

[PR] Tests: avoid NPE in JettySolrRunner lifeCycleStopped [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
dsmiley opened a new pull request, #2337: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2337 Very simple little check. I saw in a failure here: https://github.com/apache/solr/actions/runs/8180447387/job/22376604762?pr=2335 for TestLBHttp2SolrClient. -- This is an automated message from the A

Re: [PR] SOLR-16866: Deleting a non-existent directory should not fail [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
HoustonPutman commented on PR #2336: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2336#issuecomment-1984577087 Not sure if this is the end-all-be-all approach. Maybe the error occurs while it's deleting a child tree, and the rest of the files arent' deleted? Here's the stack trace:

Re: [PR] SOLR-16866: Deleting a non-existent directory should not fail [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
HoustonPutman commented on PR #2336: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2336#issuecomment-1984574418 > I'm curious, was there a reason for replacing FileUtils.deleteDirectory() with PathUtils.deleteDirectory()? @magibney https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16074 -- Thi

Re: [PR] Use a System wide property to enable PRS [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
dsmiley commented on PR #2230: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2230#issuecomment-1984571357 BTW it's nice to see PRS used/tested more :-) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

Re: [PR] SOLR-16866: Deleting a non-existent directory should not fail [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
magibney commented on PR #2336: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2336#issuecomment-1984545453 I'm curious, was there a reason for replacing `FileUtils.deleteDirectory()` with `PathUtils.deleteDirectory()`? Related: I've been in the CachingDirectoryFactory code recently and I r

Re: [PR] Use a System wide property to enable PRS [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
dsmiley commented on PR #2230: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2230#issuecomment-1984524318 I believe this has caused NullPointerExceptions in OverseerStatusTest -- createcollection is null. Quite a number of test failures for this since this was merged. -- This is an automated

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-17173) Be explicit if distrib.statsCache=true but there's no statsCache configured or not?

2024-03-07 Thread Mikhail Khludnev (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mikhail Khludnev reassigned SOLR-17173: --- Assignee: Mikhail Khludnev > Be explicit if distrib.statsCache=true but there's no s

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-17173) Be explicit if distrib.statsCache=true but there's no statsCache configured or not?

2024-03-07 Thread Mikhail Khludnev (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mikhail Khludnev updated SOLR-17173: Fix Version/s: 9.6.0 > Be explicit if distrib.statsCache=true but there's no statsCache con

Re: [PR] SOLR-16866: Deleting a non-existent directory should not fail [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
HoustonPutman commented on code in PR #2336: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2336#discussion_r1516795796 ## solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cli/CreateTool.java: ## @@ -192,7 +191,7 @@ protected void createCore(CommandLine cli, SolrClient solrClient) throws Excepti

Re: [PR] SOLR-16866: Deleting a non-existent directory should not fail [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
epugh commented on PR #2336: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2336#issuecomment-1984396468 I think I saw some problems with the `RunExampleTool` when I was trying to make it so you could run it twice, and it would reset the state on the second run.. weird things happened, so eventu

Re: [PR] SOLR-16866: Deleting a non-existent directory should not fail [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
epugh commented on code in PR #2336: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2336#discussion_r1516792080 ## solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cli/CreateTool.java: ## @@ -192,7 +191,7 @@ protected void createCore(CommandLine cli, SolrClient solrClient) throws Excepti }

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-16866) CachingDirectoryFactory Throwing Error When Closing

2024-03-07 Thread Houston Putman (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824530#comment-17824530 ] Houston Putman commented on SOLR-16866: --- I made a PR for this. Was seeing it in the

[PR] SOLR-16866: Deleting a non-existent directory should not fail [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
HoustonPutman opened a new pull request, #2336: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2336 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16866 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [PR] Clean up docker-faq.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
HoustonPutman commented on PR #2277: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2277#issuecomment-1983824945 > Hmm, if I'm not mistaken, a merge of this fix to `branch_9_5` may actually update the 9.5 guide. Let me try. You are not mistaken! -- This is an automated message from the A

Re: [PR] SOLR-16505: Switch UpdateShardHandler.getRecoveryOnlyHttpClient to Jetty HTTP2 [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
dsmiley commented on code in PR #2276: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2276#discussion_r1516376085 ## solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/IndexFetcher.java: ## @@ -261,22 +260,23 @@ public String getMessage() { } } - private static HttpClient createHtt

Re: [PR] SOLR-16505: Switch UpdateShardHandler.getRecoveryOnlyHttpClient to Jetty HTTP2 [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
iamsanjay commented on PR #2276: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2276#issuecomment-1983485002 Test case which is failing. > ./gradlew :solr:core:test --tests "org.apache.solr.handler.TestHealthCheckHandlerLegacyMode.doTestHealthCheckWithReplication" -Ptests.jvms=2 "-Ptests.jvma

Re: [PR] Clean up docker-faq.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on PR #2277: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2277#issuecomment-1983479315 The theory behind the guide build is that there is not supposed to be any functional change within a minor version, so any fixes pushed to `branch_9_5` are by definition bug fixes, including

Re: [PR] Clean up docker-faq.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on PR #2277: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2277#issuecomment-1983469119 I did a push, let's wait for daily build of https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/solr-reference-guide-official/ - I think it will kick off in an hour or so. -- This is an automated me

Re: [PR] Clean up docker-faq.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
epugh commented on PR #2277: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2277#issuecomment-1983464922 If this works...I wonder if we should try an establish a stronger pattern for doc fixes going `main` --> `branch_9x` and --> `branch_9_5` ? Though it is a whole nother step -- Thi

Re: [PR] Clean up docker-faq.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on PR #2277: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2277#issuecomment-1983460238 Hmm, if I'm not mistaken, a merge of this fix to `branch_9_5` may actually update the 9.5 guide. Let me try. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the m

Re: [PR] Make parameter descriptions consistent in faceting.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
epugh commented on PR #2162: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2162#issuecomment-1983459204 hey @cdrini do you want to take another spin though this PR and finalize some of the changes? Then I'd love to merge this! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

Re: [PR] Clean up docker-faq.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
epugh commented on PR #2277: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2277#issuecomment-1983453157 I don't believe changes to ref guides go immediately (unlike the website changes)...We don't have a "quick push this change to productioin ref guide" that isn't tied to a release. Hopefu

Re: [PR] SOLR-16505: Switch UpdateShardHandler.getRecoveryOnlyHttpClient to Jetty HTTP2 [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
iamsanjay commented on PR #2276: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2276#issuecomment-1983413759 There will be no need to add the extra code at SolrRequest level. I can just call add header for SolrRequest to add "ACCEPT_ENCODING:gzip" -- This is an automated message from the Ap

Re: [PR] SOLR-16505: Switch UpdateShardHandler.getRecoveryOnlyHttpClient to Jetty HTTP2 [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
iamsanjay commented on PR #2276: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2276#issuecomment-1983401595 ### Allow Compression HttpSolrClient provides feature to enable external compression that would add "ACCEPT_ENCODING: gzip" to the request headers. And we are using this feature in `Ind

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-17199) EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from solr-core

2024-03-07 Thread Andrzej Bialecki (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824384#comment-17824384 ] Andrzej Bialecki commented on SOLR-17199: - I didn't see it - thanks for fixing it

Re: [PR] Update dependency com.tdunning:t-digest to v3.3 [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on PR #2136: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2136#issuecomment-1983316503 So turns out the Streaming tests fail consistently with this upgrade. Have not dived into it, but there must be some incompatible behavior between these versions causing this. Anyone knows wh

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-17199) EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from solr-core

2024-03-07 Thread Jira
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl reassigned SOLR-17199: -- Assignee: Jan Høydahl > EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-17199) EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from solr-core

2024-03-07 Thread Jira
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl resolved SOLR-17199. Resolution: Fixed > EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from > solr-

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-17199) EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from solr-core

2024-03-07 Thread Jira
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-17199: --- Fix Version/s: 9.6.0 > EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from > solr

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-17199) EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from solr-core

2024-03-07 Thread Jira
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-17199: --- Affects Version/s: 9.5.0 > EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from >

Re: [PR] Move EnvToSyspropMappings.properties to solrj module [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on PR #2320: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2320#issuecomment-1983311288 Related JIRA just opened: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17199 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-17199) EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from solr-core

2024-03-07 Thread Jira
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824372#comment-17824372 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-17199: Hi, did you see [https://github.com/apache/solr/

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-17199) EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from solr-core

2024-03-07 Thread Andrzej Bialecki (Jira)
Andrzej Bialecki created SOLR-17199: --- Summary: EnvUtils in solr-solrj is missing EnvToSyspropMappings.properties from solr-core Key: SOLR-17199 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17199

Re: [PR] Clean up docker-faq.adoc [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
syats commented on PR #2277: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2277#issuecomment-1983196506 The fact that this PR is not yet in the productive documentation https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/deployment-guide/docker-faq.html as of 2023-03-07 is a source of confusion! The curre

Re: [PR] Update dependency io.swagger.core.v3:swagger-annotations-jakarta to v2.2.20 [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
janhoy merged PR #2064: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2064 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

Re: [PR] Update org.mockito:mockito* to v5.11.0 [solr]

2024-03-07 Thread via GitHub
janhoy merged PR #2325: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2325 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org