[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646911#comment-17646911
]
Noble Paul edited comment on SOLR-16448 at 12/14/22 4:09 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646911#comment-17646911
]
Noble Paul edited comment on SOLR-16448 at 12/14/22 4:08 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646911#comment-17646911
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-16448:
---
{quote} he costs for building and running that clu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646910#comment-17646910
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-16448:
-
[~krisden] Maybe get rid of ALL the white spac
dsmiley commented on code in PR #1239:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1239#discussion_r1047975716
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/core/FileSystemConfigSetService.java:
##
@@ -238,9 +238,11 @@ public List getAllConfigFiles(String configName)
throws IOException {
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1350071535
> Jetty thinks it stopped
Are you sure that is not the new "start.jar" jetty that executes the STOP
command? Cause we kind of fire up the jetty start jar to take jetty down...
--
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1350065980
> I think now that we have a super fast way of reproducing, it should be
easier to debug
Unfortunately, this may be a dead end. What I thought was a reproduction may
have been the effe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646861#comment-17646861
]
Nazerke Seidan edited comment on SOLR-15787 at 12/13/22 11:14 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646861#comment-17646861
]
Nazerke Seidan edited comment on SOLR-15787 at 12/13/22 11:13 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646861#comment-17646861
]
Nazerke Seidan edited comment on SOLR-15787 at 12/13/22 11:11 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646861#comment-17646861
]
Nazerke Seidan commented on SOLR-15787:
---
I created PR: [https://github.com/apache/s
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349954252
It is logical to think that it is related to Jetty 10.
However, it it was pure Java change, we should see same behavior on local
mac. That's why I felt the need to try from Docker to simula
endzyme commented on PR #473:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/473#issuecomment-1349943080
Thank you so much @HoustonPutman for this - Is there any way to avoid
creating a PDB via the operator?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to th
risdenk commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349922398
Well after 6ba8d29 the logs are reporting something interesting...
https://github.com/apache/solr/actions/runs/3689870566/jobs/6246292033#step:7:545
Jetty thinks it stopped
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349872685
Yea, I tried `java -jar server/start.jar --help` and get
```
--stop
Sends a stop signal to the running Jetty instance.
The running Jetty
risdenk commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349806254
@janhoy at least from github actions the pid looks correct...:
https://github.com/apache/solr/actions/runs/3689576579/jobs/6245669505
```
# line 1858
...
# runner
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646840#comment-17646840
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-16448:
---
[~krisden]
Our internal fork of Solr uses a gzip c
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349796157
> I think thats correct - as long as it isn't a `Z` or empty - it finds the
stat column without the header - so it returned a result.
Ok, might have been too quick to conclude there. An
risdenk commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349793006
> If I debug even on my laptop, the command ps -o stat='' -p $SOLR_PID
returns just a single S, not a PID
I think thats correct - as long as it isn't a `Z` or empty - it finds the
sta
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349784517
I think it is SOLR-16191
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
risdenk commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349767958
> You see Solr itself running in PID 127. But the ps command targets PID
594, which is the PID of the stop script, which sleeps in a loop of 2 seconds.
ok cool thanks @janhoy most like
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349728776
You see Solr itself running in PID 127. But the `ps` command targets PID
594, which is the PID of the stop script, which sleeps in a loop of 2 seconds.
I think now that we have a super
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349710085
I exec'ed into the container during the 180 seconds it tried to stop and
found this
```
docker exec -ti 00c425e5b1ca bash
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349707444
> I have NO idea why this passes locally before this change...
It all works on my Macbook. But in Docker under Ubuntu it is definitely not
happy
--
This is an automated message from
risdenk commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349704893
So I undid all my changes for debugging and so what is left is just the
`stop.port` and `stop.key` parts. In theory this will just work.
I have NO idea why this passes locally before t
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349704824
I reproduced this locally in Docker:
```bash
docker run --rm -ti apache/solr-nightly:10.0.0-SNAPSHOT bash
Unable to find image 'apache/solr-nightly:10.0.0-SNAPSHOT' locally
10.0
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349683700
Yes, I was just looking into the same...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
risdenk commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349677713
@janhoy
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223/commits/b6d814aace03837fcc61e2aa2f4315b93610487b
may have fixed it! I wonder if its a Jetty 10.x change...
I'm looking into
https://g
magibney commented on code in PR #1236:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1236#discussion_r1047678837
##
solr/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -177,6 +177,12 @@ Other Changes
* SOLR-16569: Add java system property to overseer queue size (Nick Ginther
via noble)
+=
risdenk commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349607818
added some debug to see what
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223/commits/94d229c2e0ca3698590c9be51acfa143a190f362
is running.
I would guess the failure is line 850 though since i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Patson Luk resolved SOLR-16586.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Add logging at the beginning of searchHandler#handleRequestBody
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Patson Luk closed SOLR-16586.
-
> Add logging at the beginning of searchHandler#handleRequestBody
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646791#comment-17646791
]
Patson Luk commented on SOLR-16586:
---
Since enabling debug on
https://github.com/apache
patsonluk commented on PR #1237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1237#issuecomment-1349536907
> Doesn't
[this](https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/6869ec97c7a59cc6acd001eb592b98ea90679fb8/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/core/SolrCore.java#L2861-L2864)
allow to achieve essentiall
patsonluk closed pull request #1237: SOLR-16586: Log start of
SearchHandler#handleRequestBody
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1237
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
georgekaz opened a new issue, #505:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/505
security.json isn't exported to Zookeeper because the logic `if [
${#ZK_SECURITY_JSON} -lt 3 ]`
[here](https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/blob/1a8661bab03656f55a3352835b8496d5e6757f9d/controller
dsmiley commented on code in PR #1236:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1236#discussion_r1047582860
##
solr/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -177,6 +177,12 @@ Other Changes
* SOLR-16569: Add java system property to overseer queue size (Nick Ginther
via noble)
+==
risdenk commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349496980
So @janhoy can you sanity check me - at the bottom of
https://github.com/apache/solr/actions/runs/3658565463 are the logs from the
integration test run.
I don't see in `solr.log` or
dsmiley commented on code in PR #1236:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1236#discussion_r1047579554
##
solr/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -177,6 +177,12 @@ Other Changes
* SOLR-16569: Add java system property to overseer queue size (Nick Ginther
via noble)
+==
risdenk commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1349463963
Well since `solr/bin/*` are the only files involved. That helps narrow it
down considerably. I would guess its one of these changes...
```
# git log branch_9x..branch_9_1 -- solr/bi
patsonluk commented on code in PR #1237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1237#discussion_r1047559663
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/SearchHandler.java:
##
@@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ protected ResponseBuilder newResponseBuilder(
@Override
public
magibney commented on PR #1237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1237#issuecomment-1349417190
Doesn't
[this](https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/6869ec97c7a59cc6acd001eb592b98ea90679fb8/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/core/SolrCore.java#L2861-L2864)
allow to achieve essentially t
patsonluk commented on code in PR #1237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1237#discussion_r1047559663
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/SearchHandler.java:
##
@@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ protected ResponseBuilder newResponseBuilder(
@Override
public
janhoy commented on issue #504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/504#issuecomment-1349385158
> Our common service (one endpoint for all nodes) has this set to true,
while the headless service has this set to false.
Thanks for the explanation. So there is a reason to
risdenk commented on code in PR #1237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1237#discussion_r1047549409
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/SearchHandler.java:
##
@@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ protected ResponseBuilder newResponseBuilder(
@Override
public v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646763#comment-17646763
]
Kevin Risden commented on SOLR-16448:
-
So just some tangential thoughts related to th
patsonluk commented on code in PR #1237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1237#discussion_r1047482742
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/SearchHandler.java:
##
@@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ protected ResponseBuilder newResponseBuilder(
@Override
public
HoustonPutman commented on issue #504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/504#issuecomment-1349006624
> So the liveness probe failing will cause k8s to kill the POD, and the
readiness probe failing will cause traffic to be temporarily routed to other
replicas, is that about
risdenk commented on code in PR #1237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1237#discussion_r1047382150
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/SearchHandler.java:
##
@@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ protected ResponseBuilder newResponseBuilder(
@Override
public v
janhoy commented on issue #504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/504#issuecomment-1348923782
So the liveness probe failing will cause k8s to kill the POD, and the
readiness probe failing will cause traffic to be temporarily routed to other
replicas, is that about right?
janhoy merged PR #499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/499
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apa
HoustonPutman commented on PR #499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/499#issuecomment-1348878380
Want to merge this @janhoy ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
HoustonPutman merged PR #473:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/473
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@s
HoustonPutman closed issue #471: How to prevent node rotation behavior from
causing cluster instability
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/471
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
HoustonPutman commented on issue #504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/504#issuecomment-1348875539
We could use different commands. We can probably start mandating Solr 8
soon, and at that point we can use the solr healthcheck handler as the
readiness check, and keep the
janhoy commented on code in PR #1236:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1236#discussion_r1047283207
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -2203,15 +2203,19 @@ public DocListAndSet getDocListAndSet(Query query, Sort
lsort, int offset,
magibney commented on code in PR #1236:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1236#discussion_r1047195884
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -2203,15 +2203,19 @@ public DocListAndSet getDocListAndSet(Query query, Sort
lsort, int offset
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646631#comment-17646631
]
Nazerke Seidan edited comment on SOLR-15787 at 12/13/22 1:57 PM:
--
janhoy opened a new issue, #504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/504
We are using kyverno to enforce certain common k8s policies, and it
complains about several things in Solr-operator.
One is this one
https://kyverno.io/policies/other/ensure_probes_different/ensu
magibney commented on code in PR #1236:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1236#discussion_r1047173635
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -2203,15 +2203,19 @@ public DocListAndSet getDocListAndSet(Query query, Sort
lsort, int offset
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646631#comment-17646631
]
Nazerke Seidan edited comment on SOLR-15787 at 12/13/22 1:22 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646631#comment-17646631
]
Nazerke Seidan commented on SOLR-15787:
---
I am looking into it. I see the problem, i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl resolved SOLR-16587.
Resolution: Duplicate
Closing as duplicate, as this is definitely same. Likely you will hit the sam
janhoy commented on code in PR #1236:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1236#discussion_r1047094224
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -2203,15 +2203,19 @@ public DocListAndSet getDocListAndSet(Query query, Sort
lsort, int offset,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646611#comment-17646611
]
Andrei Minin commented on SOLR-16587:
-
Not sure, you better know duplicate or not. My
EreMaijala commented on PR #1238:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1238#issuecomment-1348432560
For reference, I had documentCache with `maxRamMB="128"` consume 4.9 GB of
memory. A quick web search indicated that others have stumbled on this issue
before as well, so a nice little no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646602#comment-17646602
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-16587:
I believe this may be a duplicate of SOLR-16585
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646596#comment-17646596
]
Andrei Minin edited comment on SOLR-16587 at 12/13/22 12:15 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646596#comment-17646596
]
Andrei Minin edited comment on SOLR-16587 at 12/13/22 12:14 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646596#comment-17646596
]
Andrei Minin commented on SOLR-16587:
-
There is no need to create scripts - it is rep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrei Minin updated SOLR-16587:
Attachment: Screenshot from 2022-12-13 15-10-11.png
Screenshot from 2022-12-13 15-09
EreMaijala opened a new pull request, #1238:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1238
Add a note about documentCache not supporting maxRamMB setting properly.
Since Lucene's RamUsageEstimator doesn't understand the Document objects, it
will default to 256 bytes. Depending on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646592#comment-17646592
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-16587:
Hi,
Can you also try to make a minimal repro
Andrei Minin created SOLR-16587:
---
Summary: Solr 9.1.0 last page retrieval error
Key: SOLR-16587
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16587
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Securit
janhoy commented on PR #1223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1223#issuecomment-1347898389
> I added `integrationTests` task to Check jenkins job for 9.1 and 9.x as
well, so we can see if it fails for those as well, or if this is something
introduced in main.
Interesting - t
75 matches
Mail list logo
