Re: [PR] GH-3078: Use Hadoop FileSystem.openFile() to open files [parquet-java]

2024-11-27 Thread via GitHub
wgtmac commented on PR #3079: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3079#issuecomment-2505167772 @Fokko @gszadovszky Could you help review this? Thanks! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the UR

Re: [PR] GH-3074: read footer using 1 call readFully(byte[8]) instead of 5 calls [parquet-java]

2024-11-27 Thread via GitHub
wgtmac commented on PR #3075: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3075#issuecomment-2505169009 Could you try to rebase it? I think the CI failure is due to based on a problematic commit. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, p

Re: [PR] MINOR: Revert `buildnumber-maven-plugin` to 3.2.0 [parquet-java]

2024-11-27 Thread via GitHub
Fokko merged PR #3082: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3082 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@parquet.

Re: [PR] MINOR: Add shading for JDK22 specific classes [parquet-java]

2024-11-27 Thread via GitHub
Fokko merged PR #3081: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3081 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@parquet.

Re: [PR] GH-465: Clarify backward-compatibility rules on LIST type [parquet-format]

2024-11-27 Thread via GitHub
wgtmac commented on PR #466: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/466#issuecomment-2503398615 Perhaps add them like this? @pitrou ``` WARNING: WRITERS SHOULD NOT PRODUCE LIST TYPES LIKE THESE EXAMPLES! THEY ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF READING EXISTING DATA ONLY. // L

Re: [PR] GH-465: Clarify backward-compatibility rules on LIST type [parquet-format]

2024-11-27 Thread via GitHub
pitrou commented on PR #466: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/466#issuecomment-2503421529 Ok, please don't use UPPERCASE :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [PR] GH-465: Clarify backward-compatibility rules on LIST type [parquet-format]

2024-11-27 Thread via GitHub
pitrou commented on PR #466: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/466#issuecomment-2503273594 @rdblue @wgtmac I'm not sure I agree with removing the examples. They make it less likely that an implementation would interpret the written rules wrongly, IMO. Maybe we can instead s

Re: [PR] GH-465: Clarify backward-compatibility rules on LIST type [parquet-format]

2024-11-27 Thread via GitHub
pitrou commented on PR #466: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/466#issuecomment-2503276670 Concretely, if I have to review a PR implementing said compatibility rules, I'd rather have the spec spell out the examples because it makes it easier to check the PR's implementation

Re: [PR] GH-465: Clarify backward-compatibility rules on LIST type [parquet-format]

2024-11-27 Thread via GitHub
wgtmac commented on code in PR #466: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/466#discussion_r1860313055 ## LogicalTypes.md: ## @@ -609,9 +609,20 @@ that is neither contained by a `LIST`- or `MAP`-annotated group nor annotated by `LIST` or `MAP` should be interpreted