RE: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise

2000-01-14 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Cat wrote: > > On this topic of -ess endings, interestingly enough Miss Manners had > something to say about it in her most recent column. I actually agree > with some of her points -- what do you all think? > > http://search.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/2000-01/12/146

Re: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise

2000-01-14 Thread Kelly Lynn Martin
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:49:54 +0100 (CET), Nils Philippsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >So what would you like? "Its" wouldn't be nice to both genders, I >suppose. But inventing a "fourth" gender which means both real >genders isn't feasible, too? You would confuse us non-native English >speakers

RE: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise

2000-01-14 Thread Sunnanvind
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Cat wrote: > So what would you like? "Its" wouldn't be nice to both genders, I suppose. > But inventing a "fourth" gender which means both real genders isn't > feasible, too? You would confuse us non-native English speakers and we'

[issues] RE: English dominance, was : Demographics - Reprise

2000-01-14 Thread Janus
At 12:49 AM 01/14/2000 +0100, you wrote: > >So what would you like? "Its" wouldn't be nice to both genders, I suppose. >But inventing a "fourth" gender which means both real genders isn't >feasible, too? You would confuse us non-native English speakers and we'd >probably turn to Esperanto instead

Re: [issues] RE: English dominance, was : Demographics - Reprise

2000-01-14 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Janus wrote: > At 12:49 AM 01/14/2000 +0100, you wrote: > > > >So what would you like? "Its" wouldn't be nice to both genders, I suppose. > >But inventing a "fourth" gender which means both real genders isn't > >feasible, too? You would confuse us non-native English speakers

Re: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise

2000-01-14 Thread Dan McGarry
- Original Message - From: Kelly Lynn Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 11:00 PM Subject: Re: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise > On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 03:26:40 +0100, Sunnanvind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >Most women nowadays never we

Re: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise

2000-01-14 Thread Jenn V.
> > >Most women nowadays never weres dresses anymore, but it can be > > >confortable sometimes. I'd rather have people of both sexes wear > > >dresses than having it banned altogether. > > > > Men's clothing is so _boring_. A dress every now and then would liven > > things up, methinks. > > As

Re: [issues] RE: English dominance, was : Demographics - Reprise

2000-01-14 Thread Sunnanvind
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Nils Philippsen wrote: > Unlikely to succeed. Can you imagine a style here> song in Latin? Probably not. Mmm, hey, I can (Cranberries 'Electric Blue' is partially in latin) - but I still don't think that the plan will succeed - I do think English is a beautiful language (my