On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 18:19:04 -0500, Steve Kudlak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Steve adds, he will have to use spell correctors. I am pretty burnout
>today. Really bad. I am sick of companies and their uptightness, I
>will have to pick a loose company, should I change. I am loose, came
>out of that
On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Steve Kudlak wrote:
::plonk::
Next?
--
_Deirdre * http://www.linuxcabal.net * http://www.deirdre.net
"Mars has been a tough target" -- Peter G. Neumann, Risks Digest Moderator
"That's because the Martians keep shooting things down." -- Harlan Rosenthal
<[EMAIL PROTE
Steve Kudlak wrote:
> Deirdre Saoirse wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Steve Kudlak wrote:
> >
> > > But U have tons of John Malloy (dress for success) telling me how to
> > > dress. Beyond common decency boradly considered. I have been upbraided
> > > in tnetervies and walked out because of
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Rachel Greenham wrote:
> > You can also dress too casually and yet still be too stuffy for almost
> > any company. For example, I was once flown to a place where I wore a skirt
> > suit and a bright blouse -- but I found out when I arrived that it was
> > strictly a grey-suit
BEING INTENSELY DIFFERENT IS THE THING TO DO...
It really seems the only way real progress is made. Sometimes mistakes are made
that way.
I try underastand all the obejctification stuff sometimes I get it. Sometimss
no. I will try to be kind but sometimes I miss points that others see that are
Deirdre Saoirse wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Steve Kudlak wrote:
>
> > But U have tons of John Malloy (dress for success) telling me how to
> > dress. Beyond common decency boradly considered. I have been upbraided
> > in tnetervies and walked out because of this. Please tell me what I am
> >
Deirdre Saoirse wrote:
>
> On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Steve Kudlak wrote:
>
> > But U have tons of John Malloy (dress for success) telling me how to
> > dress. Beyond common decency boradly considered. I have been upbraided
> > in tnetervies and walked out because of this. Please tell me what I am
>
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Steve Kudlak wrote:
> This has been a personal issue for me for ages. I tend to think that it
> is turning be into an object, close to a slave to be forced to wear
> cetain clothese non-volunarity.
OK, trying to relate the earlier thread, THIS is what MOST women feel like
wh
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Steve Kudlak wrote:
> But U have tons of John Malloy (dress for success) telling me how to
> dress. Beyond common decency boradly considered. I have been upbraided
> in tnetervies and walked out because of this. Please tell me what I am
> missing, gentluyy. Why do I have to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Steve Kudlak wrote:
>
> > P.S>. It is a geek issue we dress unlik others. Why do I have to make people in
> > personell happy, and why should I care...other than just raw power, and what is
> > difference between she got hired for her looks and he for his clothese. OT
Steve Kudlak wrote:
> P.S>. It is a geek issue we dress unlik others. Why do I have to make people in
> personell happy, and why should I care...other than just raw power, and what is
> difference between she got hired for her looks and he for his clothese. OTher
> than one is easier to change...
Deirdre Saoirse wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 1999, Steve Kudlak wrote:
>
> > Deirdre Saoirse wrote:
> > > Ya know Steve, you seem to be missing the overall point. :)
> >
> > Well I take that as a joke. I mean we are more than out physical looks.
> > Because, as I mentioned some in some other message
12 matches
Mail list logo
