Re: [issues] languages

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ObIssues: Dancer came up with the observation that there seem to be fewer Perl > programmers available for hire at the moment (than there were six-twelve > months ago). Is this a local phenomenon? Or global? And do people have > hypotheses as to why? they all fled to

Re: [issues] Hey all!

Justin wrote: > > Hey all, > > Would everyone welcome a FreeBSD'er user into your group per chance? Hehe > I do you use Linux also btw..I am male! gosh knows i don't speak for the list, but hey -- _i_ use freebsd. and linux. and openbsd. and beos. and qnx. and solaris, now. :) (i ain't pic

[issues] eek...NOTE re @linuxchix.org addresses

Just so everyone knows...any @linuxchix.org addresses (other than mine) do not currently work. I totally forgot about that part when I changed hosts (sorry!) This will be fixed tomorrow (I'd fix it now, but my sys.admin has gone to bed already :) sorry sorry sorry (mental note: better planning

Fw: [issues] No, you don't suck, and I won't ignore you

I just spent weeks looking for someone who would take a short-term gig, and in the end flew someone in from the other side of the continent. Of course, the stars were properly aligned, he turned out to be a true hacker, and we hired him full-time before two weeks had passed -- Dan McGarry htt

Re: [issues] No, you don't suck, and I won't ignore you

On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Jamie Walker wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > ObIssues: Dancer came up with the observation that there seem to be > > fewer Perl programmers available for hire at the moment (than there > > were six-twelve months ago). Is this a local phenomenon? Or global? > > And do

Re: [issues] No, you don't suck, and I won't ignore you

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ObIssues: Dancer came up with the observation that there seem to be fewer Perl > programmers available for hire at the moment (than there were six-twelve > months ago). Is this a local phenomenon? Or global? And do people have > hypotheses as to why? One possibility: t

Re: [issues] No, you don't suck, and I won't ignore you

Caitlyn Máire Martin wrote: > You do *not* suck. You are working hard to solve a difficult problem > and not getting anything back for doing it. You deserve praise, not to > be ignored. Please don't be so hard on yourself, OK? Hear hear! Jenn V. ObIssues: Dancer came up with the observatio

Re: [issues] No, you don't suck, and I won't ignore you

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What's most entertaining is that the bug appears to be my personal mail > set up rather than having anything to do with the lists at all. man procmail :) -- _Deirdre * http://www.linuxcabal.org * http://www.deirdre.net "In /dev/nul

Re: [issues] No, you don't suck, and I won't ignore you

> You do *not* suck. You are working hard to solve a difficult problem > and not getting anything back for doing it. You deserve praise, not to > be ignored. Please don't be so hard on yourself, OK? What's most entertaining is that the bug appears to be my personal mail set up rather than havi

[issues] maybe this will work

maybe :) hopefully. it's a hack, mind you...*sigh* - deb -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ issues mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues

[issues] No, you don't suck, and I won't ignore you

Deb Richardson wrote: > hi. nothing to see here. Hi, Deb, You do *not* suck. You are working hard to solve a difficult problem and not getting anything back for doing it. You deserve praise, not to be ignored. Please don't be so hard on yourself, OK? Take care, Caity

[issues] another test (sorry, I suck, please ignore)

hi. nothing to see here. - deb -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ issues mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues