[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-23694) Disaster recovery: resetPartitions enhancements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexander Lapin updated IGNITE-23694: - Ignite Flags: (was: Docs Required,Release Notes Required) > Disaster recovery: resetP

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-23076) Start single timeout worker thread for all clients in one JVM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17899078#comment-17899078 ] Igor Sapego commented on IGNITE-23076: -- Looks good to me. > Start single timeout

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-23694) Disaster recovery: resetPartitions enhancements

Alexander Lapin created IGNITE-23694: Summary: Disaster recovery: resetPartitions enhancements Key: IGNITE-23694 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23694 Project: Ignite Is

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-23693) Sql. After canceling a long-running DML query, the implicit tx is not rolled back.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pavel Pereslegin updated IGNITE-23693: -- Description: This case is flaky. Sometimes after canceling a long-running DML query,

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-23688) Compute execution assertion in embedded mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17899073#comment-17899073 ] Evgeny Stanilovsky commented on IGNITE-23688: - Ok lets check a bit differen

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-23692) Pendings might be lost during force reset

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mikhail Efremov updated IGNITE-23692: - Description: *Description* During IGNITE-22036 there was found that in case of force r

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-23692) Pendings might be lost during force reset

Mikhail Efremov created IGNITE-23692: Summary: Pendings might be lost during force reset Key: IGNITE-23692 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23692 Project: Ignite Issue Ty

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-23623) Flaky testMissHitPercentage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17899065#comment-17899065 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-23623: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/11658/head]

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-23623) Flaky testMissHitPercentage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17899067#comment-17899067 ] Aleksandr Chesnokov commented on IGNITE-23623: -- The problem was that after

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-23691) Disable ItTableRaftSnapshotsTest.txSemanticsIsMaintained

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Roman Puchkovskiy updated IGNITE-23691: --- Description: The test has become flaky recently, fail rate is high. It has to be di

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-23691) Disable ItTableRaftSnapshotsTest.txSemanticsIsMaintained

Roman Puchkovskiy created IGNITE-23691: -- Summary: Disable ItTableRaftSnapshotsTest.txSemanticsIsMaintained Key: IGNITE-23691 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23691 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-23690) ItTableRaftSnapshotsTest.txSemanticsIsMaintained is flaky

Roman Puchkovskiy created IGNITE-23690: -- Summary: ItTableRaftSnapshotsTest.txSemanticsIsMaintained is flaky Key: IGNITE-23690 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23690 Project: Ignit

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-23110) Disallow IgniteCache#clear inside transaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17899055#comment-17899055 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-23110: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/11559/head]

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-23226) Services: deployment failed but service descriptor stay

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17899054#comment-17899054 ] Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-23226: {panel:title=Branch: [pull/11634/head]

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-23085) Out of Memory preventive actions at startup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Maksim Davydov updated IGNITE-23085: Description: There are cases, when the specified memory for Ignite (Heap, Data Regions ..

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-23603) Implicit transaction for direct RO read

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17899019#comment-17899019 ] Vladislav Pyatkov commented on IGNITE-23603: We decided to use the approach

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-23603) Implicit transaction for direct RO read

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladislav Pyatkov updated IGNITE-23603: --- Description: h3. Motivation We are creating an implicit transaction through an inte