davidradl commented on code in PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#discussion_r2179921531
##
docs/layouts/shortcodes/generated/kubernetes_operator_config_configuration.html:
##
@@ -152,6 +152,12 @@
Duration
The ti
davidradl commented on code in PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#discussion_r2179916851
##
docs/layouts/shortcodes/generated/kubernetes_operator_config_configuration.html:
##
@@ -152,6 +152,12 @@
Duration
The ti
davidradl commented on code in PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#discussion_r2179916851
##
docs/layouts/shortcodes/generated/kubernetes_operator_config_configuration.html:
##
@@ -152,6 +152,12 @@
Duration
The ti
chenyuzhi459 commented on PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#issuecomment-2958555002
I have changed the default value of new param `flink.client.io.threads` to
10.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
chenyuzhi459 commented on PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#issuecomment-2921169602
Because `flink.client.io.threads=60` specifies the number of EventExecutors
that handle event in NioEventLoopGroup, when creating NioEventLoopGroup, a
corresponding
gyfora commented on PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#issuecomment-2908716749
Why does `flink.client.io.threads=60` affect how many threads are created in
the tests? Wouldn't threads be created lazily?
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
chenyuzhi459 commented on PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#issuecomment-2904106838
I think the default value of `flink.client.io.threads=60` new parameter is
too big in the test environment, because multiple FlinkResourceContextFactory
and flinkC
chenyuzhi459 commented on PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#issuecomment-2904094832
I have reproduced the `Too many open files` issue of CI at local compile
env, I will resolved it as soon as possible
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
gaborgsomogyi commented on PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#issuecomment-2903599779
This feature looks promising. Can you plz answer because we're intended to
do a release soon?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
gyfora commented on PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#issuecomment-2900402656
Seems to be consistently broken, did you manage to build/test locally?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
chenyuzhi459 commented on PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#issuecomment-2899712189
Could you help take a look at the latest CI failure issue, which doesn't
seem to be related to this code commit?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Gi
chenyuzhi459 commented on code in PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#discussion_r2099912200
##
flink-kubernetes-operator/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/operator/service/RestClientProxy.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+/*
+ * License
gyfora commented on code in PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#discussion_r2083854374
##
flink-kubernetes-operator/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/operator/service/RestClientProxy.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to t
chenyuzhi459 commented on PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#issuecomment-2870721397
Is there any other problem with this pr? I don't know why CI check was
cancelled
@gyfora
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
chenyuzhi459 commented on PR #956:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956#issuecomment-2837981756
It depends on when will the pr https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/25788
could be merged.
If necessary, I can submit the pr fix in both 1.20 and 2.x versions
chenyuzhi459 opened a new pull request, #956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/956
## What is the purpose of the change
Add proxy for restClient, which supports to use shared `EventLoopGroup`
## Brief change log
- *Introduce a new
16 matches
Mail list logo
