Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2011#issuecomment-222535754
Nice!
Once all tests for these new cases pass as well, I'd say, feel free to
merge this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2011#issuecomment-222452659
@StephanEwen I will add unit tests for your examples.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user fpompermaier commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2011#issuecomment-221864540
From my tests it does but I think it is something that should have a unit
test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2011#issuecomment-221288209
Does this also prevent infinite recursion on non transitive recursive types?
Something like:
```java
public class A {
public B field;
}
GitHub user twalthr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2011
[FLINK-3922] [types] Infinite recursion on TypeExtractor
- [x] General
- The pull request references the related JIRA issue ("[FLINK-XXX] Jira
title text")
- The pull request addresses o
