Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2033
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2033#issuecomment-222634611
Thanks for reviewing. Merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2033#issuecomment-222557049
Just retried this. Works as expected. +1 to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2033#issuecomment-222171685
`-p` didn't work, talked to Max offline. After the fix +1 to merge. Very
nice change!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user mxm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2033
[FLINK-3887] improve dependency management for building docs
The Flink documentation build process is currently quite messy. These
changes move us to a new build process with proper dependency handling.
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2033#issuecomment-221561008
@uce Would you like to check out the changes?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
