Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1817
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1817#issuecomment-206868628
Thanks for the update @greghogan. +1 to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user greghogan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1817#issuecomment-205325957
The documentation for `zipWithIndex` now references requiring two passes
and notes `zipWithUniqueId` as an alternative.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1817#issuecomment-199694039
Changes look good.
Shall we add that `zipWithIndex` requires two passes and is hence not
pipelined and that `zipWithUniqueId` should be preferred if possible?
---
GitHub user greghogan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1817
[FLINK-3634] [docs] Fix documentation for DataSetUtils.zipWithUniqueId()
The example results now reflect recent improvements to the zipWith
functions while contrasting the dense and sparse indexin
