[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3172] Specify JobManager port in HA mod...

2016-01-15 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1458 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3172] Specify JobManager port in HA mod...

2016-01-15 Thread StephanEwen
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1458#issuecomment-171972196 Makes sense. +1 to merge --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3172] Specify JobManager port in HA mod...

2016-01-13 Thread uce
Github user uce commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1458#issuecomment-171234571 OK, I've looked into it, and option 2) needs more checks in different parts of the system in order to ensure that standalone mode correctly rejects random ports and port ran

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3172] Specify JobManager port in HA mod...

2016-01-12 Thread StephanEwen
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1458#issuecomment-171043451 True, port ranges in standalone are a problem for the TaskManagers. So our options are 1. As you implemented in this PR 2. Reuse the current confi

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3172] Specify JobManager port in HA mod...

2016-01-12 Thread uce
Github user uce commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1458#issuecomment-170937659 The port was not configured before (default 0). I agree that now that you can configure it, it makes sense to use the existing config key. ;) I would like t

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3172] Specify JobManager port in HA mod...

2016-01-11 Thread StephanEwen
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1458#issuecomment-170561792 Hmm, to me it is confusing by itself that there are different parameters for ports in HA mode and in standalone mode. Taking a step back, I would expect this

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3172] Specify JobManager port in HA mod...

2016-01-11 Thread uce
Github user uce commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1458#issuecomment-170477745 All HA configuration is prefixed with `recovery`. If we rename it as you suggest, I would like to move all HA related configuration to `jobmanager.ha`. Any opinions? --- I

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3172] Specify JobManager port in HA mod...

2016-01-04 Thread StephanEwen
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1458#issuecomment-168649715 Looks good, but the config key reads a bit confusing to me. Why prefix it with `recovery`? It affects ports also in cases where the master never dies and recovers. H

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-3172] Specify JobManager port in HA mod...

2015-12-15 Thread uce
GitHub user uce opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1458 [FLINK-3172] Specify JobManager port in HA mode - Adds support for job manager port configuration for standalone HA clusters - Re-uses everthing introduced in #1416, but moves the `retry` method to